Email this article 
(Department of Primary Teacher Education, Yogyakarta State University, Yogyakarta, 16143, Indonesia)(2) Bambang Saptono
(Department of Primary Teacher Education, Yogyakarta State University, Yogyakarta, 16143, Indonesia)(3) Agung Hastomo
(Department of Primary Teacher Education, Yogyakarta State University, Yogyakarta, 16143, Indonesia)(4) Herwin Herwin
(Department of Primary Teacher Education, Yogyakarta State University, Yogyakarta, 16143, Indonesia)(5) Amalia Rizki Ardiansyah
(Department of Primary Teacher Education, Yogyakarta State University, Yogyakarta, 16143, Indonesia)*corresponding author
AbstractThis research aims to describe the implementation of independent curriculum-based learning in mover schools. This research used a qualitative approach. The type of research used is phenomenology. The subjects of this study were selected based on purposive considerations. The participants of this study were targeted representatives of principals, teachers, students, and the relevant communities. Data collection in this study was carried out using interviews, observations, and documentation. The data was collected based on the needs of the research topic, namely independent curriculum-based learning in mover schools. The data of this study were analyzed using qualitative analysis techniques in the form of interactive analysis. The results of this study, one of the driving schools has implemented an independent curriculum. This can be seen from several key aspects of the independent curriculum, namely 1) the flow of learning objectives, 2) learning scenarios, 3) learning media that contain elements of TPACK, 4) Student Worksheets, and 5) the evaluation used. This can be used as a reference in the implementation of the independent curriculum, which in several schools is still trying to find the best pattern in its application in order to achieve the desired educational and learning goals.
KeywordsIndependent Curriculum; Mover Schools; Elementary School; TPACK; Project-Based Learning
|
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v4i3.925 |
Article metrics10.31763/ijele.v4i3.925 Abstract views : 1002 | PDF views : 359 |
Cite |
Full Text Download
|
References
[1] A. Zaafour and M. S. Salaberri-Ramiro, “Incorporating Cooperative Project-Based Learning in the Teaching of English as a Foreign Language: Teachers’ Perspectives,” Educ. Sci., vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1–12, 2022. doi: 10.3390/educsci12060388
[2] S.-Y. Lu, C.-C. Lo, and J.-Y. Syu, “Project-based learning oriented STEAM: The case of micro–bit paper-cutting lamp,” Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ., vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 2553–2575, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s10798-021-09714-1
[3] A. Saad and S. Zainudin, “A review of Project-Based Learning (PBL) and Computational Thinking (CT) in teaching and learning,” Learn. Motiv., vol. 78, p. 101802, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2022.101802
[4] A. Wisnu, “Scrutinizing Emergency Curriculum in an Elementary School: A Case Study at SDN Wonotingal Semarang,” JENIUS (Journal Educ. Policy Elem. Educ. Issues), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–11, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.22515/jenius.v3i1.4966.
[5] S. Suyanto, “A reflection on the implementation of a new curriculum in Indonesia: A crucial problem on school readiness,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, 2017, vol. 1868, no. 1, pp. 1–10, doi: 10.1063/1.4995218.
[6] A. Tohri, A. Rasyad, M. Sururuddin, and L. M. Istiqlal, “The urgency of Sasak local wisdom-based character education for elementary school in East Lombok, Indonesia,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 333–344, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v11i1.21869.
[7] H. Helda and S. Syahrani, “National Standards of Education in Contents Standards and Education Process Standards in Indonesia,” Indones. J. Educ., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 257–269, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.54443/injoe.v3i2.32.
[8] W. I. Novili, S. Utari, and Saepuzaman, “Penerapan Scientific Approach untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Saintifik dalam Domain Kompetensi Siswa SMP pada Topik Kalor,” J. Penelit. Pengemb. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 51–56, 2016, doi: 10.21009/1.02108 .
[9] J. Ortiz-Revilla, I. M. Greca, and I. Arriassecq, “A theoretical framework for integrated STEM education,” Sci. Educ., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 383–404, 2022.doi: 10.1007/s11191-021-00242-x
[10] C. Blanka, B. Krumay, and D. Rueckel, “The interplay of digital transformation and employee competency: A design science approach,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 178, p. 121575, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121575
[11] W. Sumarni, S. Sudarmin, S. S. Sumarti, and S. Kadarwati, “Indigenous knowledge of Indonesian traditional medicines in science teaching and learning using a science–technology–engineering–mathematics (STEM) approach,” Cult. Stud. Sci. Educ., pp. 1–44, 2022. Available at: Google Scholar.
[12] M. Ferreira, “A Theoretical Essay about Inclusion and the Role of Teachers in Building an Inclusive Education,” Eur. J. Educ. Pedagog., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 97–104, 2022. doi: 10.24018/ejedu.2022.3.3.353
[13] N. F. Abidin and F. I. Laskar, “Managing Diversity in History Learning Based on the Perspective of Kakawin Ramayana,” Paramita Hist. Stud. J., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 192–207, 2020, doi: 10.15294/paramita.v30i2.23690.
[14] J. Hunter, “Challenging and disrupting deficit discourses in mathematics education: positioning young diverse learners to document and share their mathematical funds of knowledge,” Res. Math. Educ., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 187–201, 2022. doi: 10.1080/14794802.2022.2088607
[15] E. Gheyssens, C. Coubergs, J. Griful-Freixenet, N. Engels, and K. Struyven, “Differentiated instruction: The diversity of teachers’ philosophy and praxis to adapt teaching to students’ interests, readiness and learning profiles,” Int. J. Incl. Educ., vol. 26, no. 14, pp. 1383–1400, 2022. doi: 10.1080/13603116.2020.1812739
[16] K. H. Chua and W. K. Bong, “Providing inclusive education through virtual classrooms: a study of the experiences of secondary science teachers in Malaysia during the pandemic,” Int. J. Incl. Educ., pp. 1–18, 2022. doi: 10.1080/13603116.2022.2042403
[17] M. P. N. Rozady and Y. P. Koten, “Scratch Sebagai Problem Solving Computational Thinking dalam Kurikulum Prototipe,” Increate-Inovasi Dan Kreasi Dalam Teknol. Inf., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 11–17, 2022. Available at: Google Scholar.
[18] M. Liyanawatta, S. Yang, Y. Liu, Y. Zhuang, and G. Chen, “Audience participation digital drama‐based learning activities for situational learning in the classroom,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 189–206, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1111/bjet.13160.
[19] S. R. Bangun, W., Degeng, I. N. S., Praherdhiono, H., & Lestari, “The effect of blended project-based learning for enhancing student’s scientific literacy skills: An experimental study in University,” Pegem J. Educ. Instr., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 223–233, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.47750/pegegog.13.01.24.
[20] M. Munawaroh, N. S. Setyani, L. Susilowati, and R. Rukminingsih, “The Effect of E-Problem Based Learning on Students’ Interest, Motivation and Achievement,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 503–518, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.29333/iji.2022.15328a.
[21] W. Darmawan and N. Harjono, “Efektivitas Problem Based Learning dan Two Stay Two Stray dalam Pencapaian Hasil Belajar,” J. Basicedu, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 402–411, 2020, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v4i2.364.
[22] K. Ulger, “The Effect of Problem-Based Learning on the Creative Thinking and Critical Thinking Disposition of Students in Visual Arts Education,” Interdiscip. J. Probl. Learn., vol. 12, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.7771/1541-5015.1649.
[23] S. Mahmudah, T. Kirana, and Y. S. Rahayu, “Profile of Students’ Critical Thinking Ability: Implementation of E-Modul Based On Problem-Based Learning,” IJORER Int. J. Recent Educ. Res., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 478–488, 2022. doi: 10.46245/ijorer.v3i4.231
[24] T. Gomez-del Rio and J. Rodriguez, “Design and assessment of a project-based learning in a laboratory for integrating knowledge and improving engineering design skills,” Educ. Chem. Eng., vol. 40, pp. 17–28, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.ece.2022.04.002
[25] Y. Yulkifli, Y. Yohandri, and H. Azis, “Development of physics e-module based on integrated project-based learning model with Ethno-STEM approach on smartphones for senior high school students,” Momentum Phys. Educ. J., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 93–103, 2022. doi: 10.21067/mpej.v6i1.6316
[26] W. Yunita, M. Zaim, H. Syarif, and Y. Zainil, “The Effectiveness of Project-Based Learning through Vlog to Improve Pre-Schoolers’ Vocabulary Mastery,” J. Obs. J. Pendidik. Anak Usia Dini, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 4661–4668, 2022.doi: 10.31004/obsesi.v6i5.2232
[27] D. V. Sigit, R. H. Ristanto, and S. N. Mufida, “Integration of Project-Based E-Learning with STEAM: An Innovative Solution to Learn Ecological Concept,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 23–40, 2022. doi: 10.29333/iji.2022.1532a
[28] S. Li, Y. Liu, and Y.-S. Su, “Differential analysis of teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) abilities according to teaching stages and educational levels,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 12, p. 7176, 2022. doi: 10.3390/su14127176
[29] S. D. Ardianti and S. A. Raida, “The Effect of Project Based Learning with Ethnoscience Approach on Science Conceptual Understanding,” J. Innov. Educ. Cult. Res., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 207–214, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.46843/jiecr.v3i2.89.
[30] D. Utari and A. R. Afendi, “Implementation of Pancasila Student Profile in Elementary School Education with Project-Based Learning Approach,” EduLine J. Educ. Learn. Innov., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 456–464, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.35877/454RI.eduline1280.
[31] F. Bakri and A. K. Sunardi, “The TPACK Implementation in Physics Textbook with Augmented Reality: Enhance The 4C Skills at Mechanics Wave Concept,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2022, vol. 2377, no. 1, p. 12080. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2377/1/012080
[32] S. Chan, A. Sarkar, B. Muir, and K. Neill, “Project-Based Learning with Contributions from Inquiry and Problem-Based Learning,” 2022, pp. 211–231. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-12168-5_12
[33] B. N. El-Mowafy and A. M. Hassan, “A Problem and Project-Based Learning Strategy to Promote Students’ Motivation in Post-pandemic Graduation Design Studio: A Prospective Comparative Study,” 2023, pp. 89–106. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-20601-6_8
[34] M. Wiandita, H. Suwono, and Y. Affriyenni, “Development of digital teaching materials in human excretion system,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, 2023, vol. 2569, no. 1, p. 60014. doi: 10.1063/5.0112282
[35] L. I. González-Pérez and M. S. Ramírez-Montoya, “Components of Education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: systematic review,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 1493, 2022. doi: 10.3390/su14031493
[36] I. Gede Sudirtha, I. Wayan Widiana, K. Setemen, N. W. Sukerti, N. K. Widiartini, and N. Santiyadnya, “The Impact of Blended Learning Assisted with Self-Assessment toward Learner Autonomy and Creative Thinking Skills,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 17, no. 6, 2022. doi: 10.3991/ijet.v17i06.29799
[37] I. Finkelstein, S. Soffer-Vital, Y. Shraga-Roitman, R. Cohen-Liverant, and T. Grebelsky-Lichtman, “An Integrative Multi-Dimensional Model of Culturally Relevant Academic Evaluation for the 21st Century,” Int. J. High. Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 187–200, 2022.doi: 10.5430/ijhe.v11n1p187
[38] M. Jannah, L. D. Prasojo, and M. A. Jerusalem, “Elementary School Teachers’ Perceptions of Digital Technology Based Learning in the 21st Century: Promoting Digital Technology as the Proponent Learning Tools,” Al Ibtida J. Pendidik. Guru MI, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 1, 2020, doi: 10.24235/al.ibtida.snj.v7i1.6088.
[39] W. Rahimah, M. Zaini, and B. Halang, “Work Sheet Development of High School Students Biology Based on Critical Thinking Skills on the Motion Systems Concept,” BIO-INOVED J. Biol. Pendidik., vol. 2, no. 2, p. 100, 2020, doi: 10.20527/bino.v2i2.8474.
[40] D. Oktasari, D. Hediansah, J. Jumadi, and W. Warsono, “Instructional Technology: Teacher’s Initial Perception of TPACK in Physics Learning,” J. Penelit. Pengemb. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 131–138, 2020, doi: 10.21009/1.06115.
[41] K. D. Barišić, B. Divjak, and V. Kirinić, “Education systems as contextual factors in the technological pedagogical content knowledge framework,” J. Inf. Organ. Sci., vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 163–183, 2019, doi: 10.31341/jios.43.2.3.
[42] N. Nurdiani, N. Y. Rustaman, W. Setiawan, and D. Priyandoko, “Reasoning patterns and modes of prospective biology teachers on embryology learning with TPACK framework,” JPBI (Jurnal Pendidik. Biol. Indones., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 93–100, 2019, doi: 10.22219/jpbi.v5i1.7375.
[43] I. Lyublinskaya and A. Kaplon-Schilis, “Analysis of Differences in the Levels of TPACK: Unpacking Performance Indicators in the TPACK Levels Rubric,” Educ. Sci., vol. 12, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.3390/educsci12020079.
[44] H. Akram, Y. Yingxiu, A. S. Al-Adwan, and A. Alkhalifah, “Technology Integration in Higher Education During COVID-19: An Assessment of Online Teaching Competencies Through Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Model,” Front. Psychol., vol. 12, no. August, pp. 1–11, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736522.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Setiawan Edi Wibowo, Bambang Saptono, Agung Hastomo, Herwin Herwin, Amalia Rizki Ardiansyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
International Journal of Education and Learning
ISSN 2684-9240
Published by Association for Scientific Computing Electronics and Engineering (ASCEE)
W : http://pubs2.ascee.org/index.php/ijele
E : zalik@ascee.org
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.