Declining idealism: A study of higher education teacher’s beliefs about grading decision making

(1) * Bambang Pratolo Mail (Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Indonesia)
(2) Eko Purwanti Mail (Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia)
*corresponding author

Abstract


This study aimed to unpack higher education teachers’ beliefs about grading decision making. A qualitative approach was employed in this study to answer the research question. In-depth semi-structured interview as the main data collecting technique was utilized to gather any information from higher education teachers. Four higher education teachers with different educational backgrounds and teaching experiences volunteered to be the participants. Three main themes were generated from the data i.e., the factors considered in grading decision making, the most challenging parts in grading, and handing students’ complaints about grades. This study indicates that developing assessment rubrics, discussing them with students, and documenting them in the learning contract may be effective strategies for teachers to remind the students of the course requirements to reach minimum criteria of mastery learning.

Keywords


Declining idealism; Teacher’s beliefs; Higher education; Grading; Decision making

   

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v3i2.374
      

Article metrics

10.31763/ijele.v3i2.374 Abstract views : 1833 | PDF views : 827

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

References


[1] E. Leu, "The Role of Teachers, Schools, and Communities in Quality Education: A Review of the Literature," Academy for Educational Development, 2005, available at: Google Scholar.

[2] R. D. Tierney, M. Simon, and J. Charland, "Being fair: Teachers’ interpretations of principles for standards-based grading," in The Educational Forum, 2011, pp. 210-227, doi: 10.1080/00131725.2011.577669.

[3] N. Nisrina, "The Pygmalion effect: how expectations influence teachers' grading decision making " Vision, vol. 16, 2020, available at: Google Scholar.

[4] L. Cheng and Y. Sun, "Teachers’ grading decision making: Multiple influencing factors and methods," Language Assessment Quarterly, vol. 12, pp. 213-233, 2015, doi: 10.1080/15434303.2015.1010726.

[5] S. M. Brookhart, Grading, 2nd ed. New York: Merril, 2009, available at: Google Scholar.

[6] L. Cheng and X. Wang, "Grading, feedback, and reporting in ESL/EFL classrooms," Language Assessment Quarterly, vol. 4, pp. 85-107, 2007, doi: 10.1080/15434300701348409.

[7] C. R. Duncan and B. Noonan, "Factors affecting teachers’ grading and assessment practices," Alberta Journal of Educational Research, vol. 53, 2007, available at: Google Scholar.

[8] X. Liu and W. Yan, "Grading in East Asia: An examination of government policies," 2015, available at: Google Scholar.

[9] J. H. McMillan, "Secondary teachers' classroom assessment and grading practices," Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, vol. 20, pp. 20-32, 2001, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3992.2001.tb00055.x.

[10] T. S. Prøitz, "Variations in grading practice–subjects matter," Education Inquiry, vol. 4, p. 22629, 2013, doi: 10.3402/edui.v4i3.22629.

[11] R. D. Tierney, "Altered grades: A grey zone in the ethics of classroom assessment," Assessment Matters, vol. 8, pp. 5-30, 2015, doi: 10.18296/am.0002.

[12] D. Yesbeck, "Grading practices: Teachers' considerations of academic and non-academic factors," 2011, available at: Google Scholar.

[13] L. G. Zoeckler, "Moral dimensions of grading in high school English," Indiana University, 2005, available at: Google Scholar.

[14] J. Mailool, H. Retnawati, S. Arifin, A. T. Kesuma, and H. Putranta, "Lecturers' Experiences in Teaching Soft Skills in Teacher Profession Education Program (TPEP) in Indonesia," Problems of Education in the 21st Century, vol. 78, pp. 215-234, 2020, doi: 10.33225/pec/20.78.215.

[15] T. R. Guskey, "Are zeros your ultimate weapon?," The Education Digest, vol. 70, p. 31, 2004, available at: Google Scholar.

[16] R. Wormeli, "Accountability: Teaching through assessment and feedback, not grading," American Secondary Education, pp. 14-27, 2006, available at: Google Scholar.

[17] T. Winger, "Grading to communicate," Educational Leadership, vol. 63, 2005, available at: Google Scholar.

[18] D. R. Sadler, "Fidelity as a precondition for integrity in grading academic achievement," Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 35, pp. 727-743, 2010, doi: 10.1080/02602930902977756.

[19] I. Didenko and N. Zhukova, "Teaching writing and error correction in an Englsih for Specific Purposes classroom in 2014 - 2020 in Ukraine " Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, pp. 363-375, 2021, doi: 10.22190/JTESAP2103363D.

[20] L. W. Anderson, "A critique of grading: Policies, practices, and technical matters," education policy analysis archives, vol. 26, p. 49, 2018, doi: 10.14507/epaa.26.3814.

[21] D. B. Reeves, "Effective grading," ed: ASSOC SUPERVISION CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT 1703 N BEAUREGARD ST, ALEXANDRIA …, 2008, available at: Google Scholar.

[22] J. H. McMillan, Assessment essentials for standards-based education: Corwin Press, 2008, available at: Google Scholar.

[23] K. O’Connor, "A repair kit for grading," Portland, OR: Educational Testing Service, 2007, available at: Google Scholar.

[24] J. Carifio and T. Carey, "A critical examination of current minimum grading policy recommendations," The High School Journal, vol. 93, pp. 23-37, 2009, doi: 10.1353/hsj.0.0039.

[25] I. Isnawati and A. Saukah, "Teachers' grading decision making " Teflin Journal, vol. 28, pp. 155-169, 2017, doi: 10.15639/teflinjournal.v28i2/155-169.

[26] G. D. Warsen, "Making Grades Matter: Connections Between Teacher Grading Practices and Attention to State Assessment," 2013, available at: Google Scholar.

[27] J. W. Creswell, W. E. Hanson, V. L. Clark Plano, and A. Morales, "Qualitative research designs: Selection and implementation," The counseling psychologist, vol. 35, pp. 236-264, 2007, doi: 10.1177/0011000006287390.

[28] A. Fontana and J. H. Frey, "The interview," The Sage handbook of qualitative research, vol. 3, pp. 695-727, 2005, available at: Google Scholar.

[29] S. L. Dworkin, "Sample Size Policy for Qualitative Studies Using In-Depth Interviews," Archives of Sexual Behavior, vol. 41, pp. 1319-1320, 2012/12/01 2012, doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-0016-6.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Bambang Pratolo, Eko Purwanti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Education and Learning
ISSN 2684-9240
Published by Association for Scientific Computing Electronics and Engineering (ASCEE)
W : http://pubs2.ascee.org/index.php/ijele
E : zalik@ascee.org


View IJELE Stats


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.