Email this article 
(Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember, Indonesia)*corresponding author
AbstractMany education institutions implement e-learning to replace traditional face-to-face teaching and learning activities due to the Covid19 pandemic. The situation forced students and teachers to adapt to the new normal of teaching and learning activities. This study aimed to evaluate the teachers' intention to use e-learning after almost a year after the Covid19 pandemic widespread began, using Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) approach. The partial Least Square-Structural Equation Model (PLS-SEM) technique was employed to evaluate the intention to use e-learning. Using 291 samples of Teachers in Indonesia, this study shows that the TAM approach describes the antecedent of teachers' intention to use e-learning during a pandemic. Perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and job relevance are determinant factors of teachers’ intention to use e-learning during the pandemic.
KeywordsTechnology Acceptance Model; Teacher; E-learning; Covid-19
|
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v3i3.315 |
Article metrics10.31763/ijele.v3i3.315 Abstract views : 1395 | PDF views : 830 |
Cite |
Full Text Download
|
References
[1] World Health Organization, “Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/. [Accessed: 01-May-2020].
[2] D. Van, M.-L. McLaws, J. Crimmins, C. R. MacIntyre, and H. Seale, “University life and pandemic influenza: Attitudes and intended behaviour of staff and studentsetowards pandemic (H1N1) 2009,” BMC Public Health, vol. 10, no. 130, 2010, doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-130.
[3] Mailizar, A. Almanthari, S. Maulina, and S. Bruce, “Secondary school mathematicseteachers’ views on e-learning implementation barriers duringethe COVID-19 pandemic:ethe case of Indonesia,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci.etechnol. Educ., vol. 16, no. 7, 2020, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/8240.
[4] S. Sukendro et al., “Using an extendedetechnology Acceptance Modeleto understand students’ use of e-learning during Covid-19: Indonesian sport science education context,” Heliyon, vol. 6, no. 11, p. e05410, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05410.
[5] S. Abbasi,et. Ayoob, A. Malik, and S. I. Memon, “Perceptions of students regarding e-learning during covid-19 at a private medical college,” Pakistan J. Med. Sci., vol. 36, no. COVID19-S4, pp. S57–S61, 2020, doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.COVID19-S4.2766.
[6] T.eteo, C. B. Lee, C. S. Chai, and S. L. Wong, “Assessingethe intentioneto useetechnology among pre-serviceeteachers in Singapore and Malaysia: A multigroup invariance analysis ofetheetechnology Acceptance Model (TAM),” Comput. Educ., vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 1000–1009, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.017.
[7] W. S. Luan andet.eteo, “Investigatingetheetechnology acceptance among studenteteachers in Malaysia: An application ofetheetechnology acceptance model (TAM),” Asia-Pacific Educ. Res., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 261–272, 2009, doi: 10.3860/taper.v18i2.1327.
[8] S. Y. Park, “An analysis ofetheetechnology acceptance model in understanding students’ behavioral intentioneto use e-Learning,” Educ.etechnol. Soc., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 150–162, 2009, available at: Google Scholar.
[9] H. Holden and R. Rada, “Understandingethe influence of perceived usability andetechnology self-efficacy oneteachers’etechnology acceptance,” J. Res.etechnol. Educ., vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 343–367, 2011, doi: 10.1080/15391523.2011.10782576.
[10] A. Al-Adwan, A. Al-Adwan, and J. Smedley, “Exploring students acceptance of e-learning usingetechnology Acceptance Model in Jordanian Universities,” Int. J. Educ. Dev. Using Inf. Commun.etechnol., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 4–18, 2013, available at: Google Scholar.
[11] S. Alharbi and S. Drew, “Usingetheetechnology Acceptance Model in understanding academics’ behavioural intentioneto use learning management systems,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 143–155, 2014, doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2014.050120.
[12] R. Scherer, F. Siddiq, and J.etondeur, “Theetechnology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approacheto explainingeteachers’ adoption of digitaletechnology in education,” Comput. Educ., vol. 128, pp. 13–35, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009.
[13] A. Omar, D. Kalulu, and G. Alijani, “Management of innovative e-learning environments,” Acad. Educ. Leadersh. J., vol. 15, no. 3, p. 37, 2011, available at: Google Scholar.
[14] V. Shute, S. Rahimi, and B. Emihovich, “Assessment for learning in immersive environments,” in Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Realities in Education, D. Liu, C. Dede, R. Huang, and J. Richard, Eds. Springer, 2017, pp. 71–87, doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-5490-7_5.
[15] D. J. Lemay, M. M. Morin, P. Bazelais, andet. Doleck, “Modeling Students’ Perceptions of Simulation-Based Learning Usingetheetechnology Acceptance Model,” Clin. Simul. Nurs., vol. 20, pp. 28–37, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2018.04.004.
[16] A. Granić and N. Marangunić, “Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review,” Br. J. Educ.etechnol., vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 2572–2593, 2019, doi: 10.1111/bjet.12864.
[17] A.et. Baharin, H. Lateh, S. S. Nathan, and H. mohd Nawawi, “Evaluating Effectiveness of IDEWL Usingetechnology Acceptance Model,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 171, pp. 897–904, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.207.
[18] P. J. H. Hu,et. H. K. Clark, and W. W. Ma, “Examiningetechnology acceptance by schooleteachers: A longitudinal study,” Inf. Manag., 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00050-8.
[19] F. D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of informationetechnology,” MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–339, 1989, doi: 10.2307/249008.
[20] H. Wold, “Soft modelling:ethe basic design and some extensions,” Syst. under Indirect Obs. Causality-structure-prediction, 1982, available at: Google Scholar.
[21] H. Wold, “Soft Modeling:ethe Basic Design and Some Extensions,” in Systems Under Indirect Observations: Part II, K. G. Jöreskog and H. Wold, Eds. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1982, pp. 1–54, available at: Google Scholar.
[22] J. Henseler, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, “Using partial least squares path modeling in advertising research: Basic concepts and recent issues,” in Handbook of Research on International Advertising, 2012, available at: Google Scholar.
[23] T. K. Djikstra, “Latent Variables and Indices: Herman Wold’s Basic Design and Partial Least Squares,” in Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications, vol. II, V. E. Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, and H. Wang, Eds. Heidelberg: Springer, 2010, pp. 23–46, doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_2.
[24] J.-B. Lohmöller, Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares. 1989, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-52512-4.
[25] J. B. Lohmöller, Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares. Heidelberg: Physica, 1989, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-52512-4.
[26] J. Hair Jr, G.et. Hult, C. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) - Joseph F. Hair, Jr., G.etomas M. Hult, Christian Ringle, Marko Sarstedt. 2016, doi: 10.15358/9783800653614.
[27] J. F. Hair, W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, R. E. Anderson, and R. L. Latham, Multivariant Data Analysis. New Jersey: Pearson International Edition, 2006, available at: Google Scholar.
[28] J. C. Nunnally and I. H. Bernstein, Psychometricetheory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994, available at: Google Scholar.
[29] F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw, “User Acceptance of Computeretechnology: A Comparison ofetwoetheoretical Models,” Manage. Sci., vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 982–1003, 1989, doi: 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982.
[30] B. Šumak, M. Heričko, and M. Pušnik, “A meta-analysis of e-learningetechnology acceptance:ethe role of useretypes and e-learningetechnologyetypes,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 2067–2077, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.005.
[31] G. G. Smith, A. J. Heindel, and A.et.etorres-Ayala, “E-learning commodity or community: Disciplinary differences between online courses,” Internet High. Educ., vol. 11, no. 3–4, pp. 152–159, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.008.
[32] A. Assareh and M. Hosseini Bidokht, “Barrierseto E-teaching and E-learning,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 3, pp. 791–795, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.129.
[33] D. S. Batubara, “Kompetensieteknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi Guru SD/MI (Potret, Faktor-faktor, dan Upaya Meningkatkannya),” Muallimuna, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 48–65, 2017, available at: Google Scholar.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Hanafi Hanafi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
International Journal of Education and Learning
ISSN 2684-9240
Published by Association for Scientific Computing Electronics and Engineering (ASCEE)
W : http://pubs2.ascee.org/index.php/ijele
E : zalik@ascee.org
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.