An Adaptive Control for the Path Tracking of an Active Leg Prosthesis

(1) * Rahma Boucetta Mail (Department of Physics, Sciences Faculty of Sfax, University of Sfax, Soukra Road, Sfax, Tunisia, Tunisia)
(2) Wiem Abdallah Mail (University of Gabes, Tunisia)
(3) Saloua Bel Hadj Ali Mail (Farhat Hached Campus, Tunisia)
*corresponding author


This paper presents an adaptive fuzzy-PID control strategy applied to an active lower limb prosthesis for trajectories tracking in normal walking, stairs climbing, and stairs descent. Trying to imitate a natural human limb, the prosthesis design challenges rehabilitating amputees to resume normal activities. A dynamic model of an ankle-knee active prosthesis is developed without ground reaction in a first case and introduces ground effect in a second one to ameliorate prothesis performances. The obtained models are used to synthesize a control strategy based on TS fuzzy concepts and PID control to reproduce human lower limb behavior in a normal gait and climb and descent of stairs. The RSME errors are calculated to evaluate and compare the various results performances and eventually show the capacity of the proposed control with ground reaction impact on trajectory tracking. The RMSE values obtained for the four outputs of the fuzzy controller are very small for the different modes of locomotion. Moreover, they become weaker when the ground reaction forces are added to the model to show the role of these forces for the body equilibrium maintaining during the gait cycle. The developed approach ensured good trajectories tracking compared to a healthy leg even in presence of disturbances.


Active lower limb prosthesis; Dynamics; Ground forces; TS fuzzy system; PID control; LS method



Article metrics

10.31763/ijrcs.v1i2.350 Abstract views : 55635 | PDF views : 592




Full Text



[1] G. Bastas, ”Lower Limb Amputations,” Essentials of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, pp. 658-663, 2020.

[2] S.S. Mathew-Steiner, D. Khona, and C.K. Sen, ”The diabetic foot,” Wound Healing, Tissue Repair, and Regeneration in Diabetes, pp. 3-12, 2020.

[3] A.S. Sarvestani, and A.T. Azam, ”Amputation: A Ten-Year Survey,” Journal of Trauma and Emergency Medicine, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 126-128, 2013.

[4] M. Windrich, M. Grimmer, O. Christ, S. Rinderknecht, and P. Beckerle, ”Active lower limb prosthetics: a systematic review of design issues and solutions,” BioMedical Engineering OnLine, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 140, 2016.

[5] S. Thoualt, and A. Allais, ”La biorobotique, Definition et objectifs,” 2015. Retrieved from

[6] R. Seymour, Prosthetics and orthotics: lower limb and spinal, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002.

[7] M. Grimmer, Powered lower limb prostheses, Technische Universität, 2015.

[8] A.K. Lapre, ”Semi-Active Damping for an Intelligent Adaptive Ankle Prosthesis,” Thesis, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 2012.

[9] P. Artemiadis, Neuro-robotics: From brain machine interfaces to rehabilitation robotics, Springer, 2014.

[10] D.S. Pieringer, M. Grimmer, M.F. Russold, and R. Riener, ”Review of the actuators of active knee prostheses and their target design outputs for activities of daily living,” International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics ICORR’2017, pp. 1246-1253, 2017.

[11] B.J. Darter, and J.M. Wilken. ”Energetic consequences of using a prosthesis with adaptive ankle motion during slope walking in persons with a transtibial amputation,” Prosthetics and Orthotics International, vol. 38, pp. 5-11, 2014.

[12] J.G. Buckley, W.D. Spence, and S.E. Solomonidis, ”Energy cost of walking: Comparison of intelligent prosthesis with conventional mechanism,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 78, pp. 330-333, 1997.

[13] V. Agrawal, R.S. Gailey, I.A. Gaunaurd, C. O’Toole, A. Finnieston, and R. Tolchin, ”Comparison of four different categories of prosthetic feet during ramp ambulation in unilateral transtibial amputees,” Prosthetics and Orthotics International, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 380-389, 2015.

[14] E.J. Wolf, V.Q. Everding, A.A. Linberg, J.M. Czerniecki, and C.J.M. Gambel, ”Comparison of the Power Knee and C-Leg during step-up and sit-to-stand tasks,” Gait and posture, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 397-402, 2013.

[15] R. Bellman, M.A. Holgate, and T. Sugar, ”Design of an active robotic ankle prosthesis with two actuated degrees of freedom using regenerative kinetics,” 2nd IEEE RAS and EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics BioRob, pp. 511-516, 2008.

[16] F.C. SupIV, A. Bohara, and M. Goldfarb, ”Design and Control of a Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, 27(2), pp. 263-273, 2008.

[17] J. Geeroms, L.L. Flynn, R.J. Fabian, and D. Lefeber, ”Ankle-knee prosthesis with powered ankle and energy transfer for CYBERLEGs,” IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, pp. 1-20, 2013.

[18] P. Aerts, R.F. Ker, D. De Clercq, D.W. Ilsley, and R.McN. Alexander, ”The mechanical properties of the human heel pad: A paradox resolved,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 1299-1308, 1995.

[19] J.R. Usherwood, K.L. Szymanek, and M.A. Daley, ”Compass gait mechanics account for top walking speeds in ducks and humans,” Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 211, no. 23, pp. 3744-9, 2008.

[20] S. Mochon, and T.A. McMahon, ”Ballistic walking: an improved model,” Mathematical Biosciences, vol. 52, pp. 241-260, 1980.

[21] T. McGeer, ”Passive Dynamic Walking,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 62-82, 1990.

[22] A.D. Kuo, ”Energetics of Actively Powered Locomotion Using the Simplest Walking Model,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 113-20, 2002.

[23] M. Nobile, P. Perego, L. Piccinini, E. Mani, A. Rossi, M. Bellina, and M. Massimo, ”Further evidence of complex motor dysfunction in drug naive children with autism using automatic motion analysis of gait,” Autism, 15(3), pp. 263-83, 2011.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 Rahma Boucetta

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


About the JournalJournal PoliciesAuthor Information

International Journal of Robotics and Control Systems
e-ISSN: 2775-2658
Organized by: Association for Scientific Computing Electronics and Engineering (ASCEE)Peneliti Teknologi Teknik IndonesiaDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan and Kuliah Teknik Elektro
Published by: Association for Scientific Computing Electronics and Engineering (ASCEE)
Office: Jalan Janti, Karangjambe 130B, Banguntapan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia