Email this article 
(Department of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia)(2) Khurin Nabila
(Department of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia)(3) Agung Bella Putra Utama
(Department of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia)(4) Purnomo Purnomo
(Department of Mechanical Engineering and Industrial, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia)(5) Felix Andika Dwiyanto
(Institute of Computer Science, AGH University of Kraków, Kraków, Poland)*corresponding author
AbstractSocial informatics is an interdisciplinary area that examines how information and communication technologies (ICT) and the complex web of social and cultural contexts interact and change over time. This study not only helps with the design and use of ICT but also shows how these technologies significantly affect society and culture. It encourages new ideas, collaborations between different fields, and policymaking insights, which drives technological innovation and a better knowledge of how ICT affects society. The Conceive, Design, Implement, operate (CDIO) educational system stands out as a new and innovative teaching method. It emphasizes active learning and gives engineering students both technical and social skills. Its use in social informatics ushers in a new era of education that combines innovation and technology to help students become strong and independent. Future study on CDIO programs in social informatics education has the potential to augment the technical proficiency and social consciousness of graduates, thereby rendering them significant contributors to the field.
KeywordsSocial Informatics; Information and Communication Technologies (ICT); Interdisciplinary; CDIO; Engineering Education
|
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v5i2.1175 |
Article metrics10.31763/ijele.v5i2.1175 Abstract views : 481 | PDF views : 230 |
Cite |
Full Text Download
|
References
[1] C. Thyssen, J. Huwer, T. Irion, and S. Schaal, “From TPACK to DPACK: The ‘Digitality-Related Pedagogical and Content Knowledge’-Model in STEM-Education,” Educ. Sci., vol. 13, no. 8, p. 769, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.3390/educsci13080769.
[2] M. Rohde, C. Müller, T. Ludwig, G. Stevens, V. Pipek, and V. Wulf, “Socio-Informatics: A Practice-Based Research and Design Paradigm,” Socio-Informatics Des. Soc. Pract. A Condens. Anthol. 25 Years Res., p. 14.
[3] A. Sestino, A. Kahlawi, and A. De Mauro, “Decoding the data economy: a literature review of its impact on business, society and digital transformation,” Eur. J. Innov. Manag., Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1108/EJIM-01-2023-0078.
[4] N. I. Melnikova and O. A. Romanovskaya, “The Russian concept of social informatics in light of information technology innovation: a systematic review,” Acta Inform. Pragensia, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 301–332, 2021. doi: 10.18267/j.aip.172
[5] Z. Smutny and M. Dolezel, “Social Informatics Challenges Connected with Generational Changes and the Design, Acceptance and Use of ICT,” in 2019 International Conference on Engineering Technologies and Computer Science (EnT), 2019, pp. 75–79, doi: 10.1109/EnT.2019.00021.
[6] A. W. Dunbar, “Every information context is a CRiTical Race information Theory opportunity: informatic considerations for the information industrial complex,” Digit. Transform. Soc., Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1108/DTS-02-2023-0013.
[7] V. Wulf, A. Weibert, K. Aal, S. Rüller, and M. Rohde, “The Praxeological Research Programme of Socio-Informatics–the Siegen School,” Acta Inform. Pragensia, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 333–348, 2021. doi: 10.18267/j.aip.171
[8] Y. Wang, Y. Song, Z. Ma, and X. Han, “Multidisciplinary considerations of fairness in medical AI: A scoping review,” Int. J. Med. Inform., vol. 178, p. 105175, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105175.
[9] Y. Yang, C. Zhang, K. Zhao, and Q. Wang, “The shifting role of information processing and management in interdiscipline development: From a collection of tools to a crutch?,” Inf. Process. Manag., vol. 60, no. 4, p. 103388, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103388.
[10] Z. Ba, Y. Cao, J. Mao, and G. Li, “A hierarchical approach to analyzing knowledge integration between two fields—a case study on medical informatics and computer science,” Scientometrics, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 1455–1486, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11192-019-03103-1.
[11] P. Fichman, M. R. Sanfilippo, and H. Rosenbaum, Social informatics evolving. Springer Nature, 2022.
[12] Z. Smutny and V. Vehovar, “Social Informatics Research: Schools of Thought, Methodological Basis, and Thematic Conceptualization,” J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 529–539, May 2020, doi: 10.1002/asi.24280.
[13] A. Gamble, “Artificial intelligence and mobile apps for mental healthcare: a social informatics perspective,” Aslib J. Inf. Manag., vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 509–523, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1108/AJIM-11-2019-0316.
[14] I. Krasonikolakis, M. Tsarbopoulos, and T.-Y. Eng, “Are incumbent banks bygones in the face of digital transformation?,” J. Gen. Manag., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 60–69, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1177/0306307020937883.
[15] S. Paparini et al., “Case study research for better evaluations of complex interventions: rationale and challenges,” BMC Med., vol. 18, no. 1, p. 301, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01777-6.
[16] E. B. Tugtekin and M. Koc, “Understanding the relationship between new media literacy, communication skills, and democratic tendency: Model development and testing,” New Media Soc., vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1922–1941, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1177/1461444819887705.
[17] A. R. Rajabzadeh, M. Mehrtash, and S. Srinivasan, “Multidisciplinary Problem-Based Learning (MPBL) Approach in Undergraduate Programs,” 2022, pp. 454–463. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-96296-8_41
[18] D. J. Tedick and R. Lyster, Scaffolding language development in immersion and dual language classrooms. Routledge, 2019. doi: 10.4324/9780429428319
[19] S. White, S. White, and K. Borthwick, “Blended professionals, technology and online learning: Identifying a socio‐technical third space in higher education,” High. Educ. Q., vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 161–174, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1111/hequ.12252.
[20] A. Ghosh, A. Nafalski, Z. Nedic, and A. P. Wibawa, “Learning management systems with emphasis on the Moodle at UniSA,” Bull. Soc. Informatics Theory Appl., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 13–21, May 2019, doi: 10.31763/businta.v3i1.160.
[21] I. Blau, T. Shamir-Inbal, and O. Avdiel, “How does the pedagogical design of a technology-enhanced collaborative academic course promote digital literacies, self-regulation, and perceived learning of students?,” Internet High. Educ., vol. 45, p. 100722, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100722.
[22] G. Garcés and C. Peña, “Adapting engineering education to BIM and industry 4.0: A view from Kolb’s experiential theory in the laboratory,” Ingeniare, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 497–512, 2022, doi: 10.4067/S0718-33052022000300497.
[23] A. Deguchi et al., “What is society 5.0,” Society, vol. 5, no. 0, pp. 1–24, 2020. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-2989-4_1
[24] A. Beniiche, S. Rostami, and M. Maier, “Society 5.0: Internet as if People Mattered,” IEEE Wirel. Commun., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 160–168, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1109/MWC.009.2100570.
[25] A. P. Wibawa, F. A. Dwiyanto, T. Widiyaningtiyas, I. Made Wirawan, W. S. Gunawan Iriyanto, and A. S. Ahmar, “Utilization Visualgo.net as a Data Structure Learning Media based on CDIO,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1028, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012064.
[26] S. Kulkarni, S. Patil, and R. Pawar, “Adoption of the conceive-design-implement-operate approach to the third year project in a team-based design-build environment,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 172, pp. 559–567, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.068.
[27] S. Namasivayam, M. H. Fouladi, D. T. K. Tien, and J. A. S. Moganakrishnan, “Design Engineering as a Means to Enhance Student Learning in Addressing Complex Engineering Challenges,” in Design Education Today, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 249–270. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-17134-6_11
[28] A. Van den Beemt et al., “Interdisciplinary engineering education: A review of vision, teaching, and support,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 508–555, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1002/jee.20347.
[29] E. F. Crawley and A. E. Hosoi, “Moving Forward with the New Engineering Education Transformation (NEET) program at MIT-Building community, developing projects, and connecting with industry,” 2019.
[30] S. Julius Fusic, N. Anandh, D. Anitha, T. Sugumari, and H. Sri Vinodhini, “Impact of implementing project‐based assignment (PBA) in CDIO framework for computer numerical control application course,” Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 1577–1590, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1002/cae.22545.
[31] H. Arruda and É. R. Silva, “Assessment and Evaluation in Active Learning Implementations: Introducing the Engineering Education Active Learning Maturity Model,” Educ. Sci., vol. 11, no. 11, p. 690, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.3390/educsci11110690.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Aji Prasetya Wibawa, Khurin Nabila, Agung Bella Putra Utama, Purnomo Purnomo, Felix Andika Dwiyanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
International Journal of Education and Learning
ISSN 2684-9240
Published by Association for Scientific Computing Electronics and Engineering (ASCEE)
W : http://pubs2.ascee.org/index.php/ijele
E : zalik@ascee.org
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.