Audience reception of acculturation in parenting style on Indonesian-Korean YouTube channel

(1) * Rizki Briandana Mail (Universitas Mercu Buana, Indonesia)
(2) Nindyta Aisyah Dwityas Mail (Universitas Mercu Buana, Indonesia)
(3) Putri Calista Mayde Mail (Universitas Mercu Buana, Indonesia)
*corresponding author

Abstract


The aim of this study is to investigate the audience reception of acculturation in parenting style on the Indonesian-Korean YouTube channel "Kimbab Family". Parenting is an activity aimed at helping children to meet challenges from the environment as well as developing. This study focuses on the interpretations of young adult audiences on the YouTube channel. Thirty-six informants were selected as primary data using FGD techniques. From the results obtained by the researchers through FGDs with the informants, it was shown that the audiences reception on the YouTube channel is diverse and influential. By combining Indonesian and Korean parenting styles, the Kimbab Family has become a source of inspiration and a role model for effective parenting. This research highlights the need for further exploration of the role of media platforms in shaping audience perceptions and expectations, as well as the potential benefits and challenges of incorporating diverse cultural influences in parenting practices.


Keywords


Parenting, Early Adulthood, Audience Reception Analysis, Kimbab Family

   

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31763/ijcs.v5i2.991
      

Article metrics

10.31763/ijcs.v5i2.991 Abstract views : 474 | PDF views : 139

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

References


[1] H. ZareeiMahmoodabad, M. Modaresi, and K. BarzegarBafroei, “Comparison of the parenting styles, quality of life, and family functioning between dual career and single career families in Yazd City,” J. Tolooebehdasht, 2019.

[2] B. Nansen and D. Jayemanne, “Infants, interfaces, and intermediation: Digital parenting and the production of ‘iPad Baby’ videos on YouTube,” J. Broadcast. Electron. Media, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 587–603, 2016.

[3] N. J. Evans, M. G. Hoy, and C. C. Childers, “Parenting ‘YouTube natives’: The impact of pre-roll advertising and text disclosures on parental responses to sponsored child influencer videos,” J. Advert., vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 326–346, 2018.

[4] J. Ørmen and A. Gregersen, “Towards the engagement economy: interconnected processes of commodification on YouTube,” Media, Cult. Soc., p. 25, 2022.

[5] M. Crick, “YouTube: Surveillance, Power, Audience, and Monetizing the Message,” in Biometrics: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, IGI Global, 2017, pp. 1439–1463.

[6] N. Nuzhatussholehah and J. K. Jamiati, “meaning of Laurier’s Advertising Message version #ThisistheGirlsway comfortable be yourself! on Youtube,” COMMICAST, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 128–141, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.12928/commicast.v3i2.5947.

[7] R. Briandana, F. Fasta, E. J. Mihardja, and A. Qasem, “Exploring Self Identity : An Analysis of Audience Reception of Vlogs,” ASPIKOM, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 303–314, 2021, doi: 10.24329/aspikom.v6i2.921.

[8] Y. H. Yudha, R. F. Marta, and H. Panggabean, “Discourse of Faking by Civil Servant Selection Participants on YouTube,” J. Komun. Untar, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 118–132, 2021, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.24912/jk.v13i1.11101.

[9] M. Holland, “How YouTube Developed into a Successful Platform for User-Generated Content,” Elon J. Undergrad. Res. Commun., vol. 7, p. 1, 2016, doi: http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/a?id=1477.

[10] L. Jones, “Discourses of transnormativity in vloggers’ identity construction,” Int. J. Soc. Lang., vol. 2019, no. 256, pp. 85–101, 2019.

[11] S. M. G. Tambunan, “Linking Privatised Large-Family Domestic Space with a Public Audience: An Analysis of Housewives who are YouTube Vloggers.,” Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. Humanit., vol. 28, no. 1, 2020.

[12] A. B. de Guzman, J. C. B. Mesana, M. E. Manuel, K. C. A. Arcega, R. L. T. Yumang, and K. N. V Miranda, “Examining intergenerational family members’ creative activities during COVID-19 lockdown via manifest content analysis of YouTube and TikTok videos,” Educ. Gerontol., vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 458–471, 2022.

[13] S. Livingstone, Making sense of television: The psychology of audience interpretation. London: Routledge, 2013.

[14] R. Briandana, R. F. Marta, and A. A. Azmawati, “Reflection on the Identity of the Outermost Indonesian Community on Sebatik Island through Malaysian Television Broadcasts,” J. Komun., vol. 13, no. 2, p. 215, 2021, doi: 10.24912/jk.v13i2.10950.

[15] R. Chopra, Global media, culture, and identity: Theory, cases, and approaches. London: Routledge, 2011.

[16] B. Ajilchi, A. Borjali, and M. Janbozorgi, “The impact of a parenting skills training program on stressed mothers and their children’s self-esteem level,” Procedia-Social Behav. Sci., vol. 30, pp. 316–326, 2011.

[17] M. S. Hoghughi and N. Long, Handbook of parenting: theory and research for practice. Sage, 2004.

[18] C. R. Lotto, E. R. P. Altafim, and M. B. M. Linhares, “Maternal history of childhood adversities and later negative parenting: a systematic review,” Trauma, Violence, Abus., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 662–683, 2023.

[19] G. Affuso et al., “The effects of teacher support, parental monitoring, motivation and self-efficacy on academic performance over time,” Eur. J. Psychol. Educ., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2023.

[20] Z. Perusko, D. Vozab, and A. Čuvalo, “Media Audiences| Digital Mediascapes, Institutional Frameworks, and Audience Practices Across Europe,” Int. J. Commun., vol. 9, no. 4, p. 23, 2015.

[21] M. Barker and E. Mathijs, “Researching world audiences: The experience of a complex methodology,” Participations, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 664–689, 2012.

[22] A. Gray, “Audience and Reception Research in Retrospect: The Trouble with Audiences,” Rethink. media audience new agenda, pp. 22–37, 1999.

[23] S. B. Wahyono, M. K. Wirasti, and B. M. Ratmono, “Audience Reception of Hoax Information on Social Media in the Post-Truth Era,” J. Komun. Indones., pp. 110–124, 2020.

[24] R. Briandana and A. A. Azmawati, “The influx of national identity: ‘imagined communities’ on Indonesian audience in Indonesia and Malaysia frontier,” J. Stud. Komun. (Indonesian J. Commun. Stud., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 24, 2021, doi: 10.25139/jsk.v5i1.2846.

[25] A. C. La Pastina, “Telenovela Reception in Rural Brazil: Gendered Readings and Sexual Mores,” Crit. Stud. Media Commun., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 162–181, 2004.

[26] K. Holland, R. Warwick Blood, and S. Thomas, “Viewing The Biggest Loser: Modes of Reception and Reflexivity Among Obese people,” Soc. Semiot., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 16–32, 2015.

[27] D. C. Mcmillin, “Choosing Commercial Television’s Identities in India : A Reception Analysis,” Continuum (N. Y)., vol. 4312, no. March, 2016, doi: 10.1080/10304310220121037.

[28] A. P. S. K. Adinda putri and F. G. S. Filosa gita, “Representation of globalization on Youtube video ‘Wonderland Indonesia,’” COMMICAST, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 158–167, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.12928/commicast.v3i2.5950.

[29] M. Knight, “Data journalism in the UK: a preliminary analysis of form and content,” J. media Pract., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 55–72, 2015.

[30] S. D. Reese and P. J. Shoemaker, “A Media Sociology for the Networked Public Sphere: The Hierarchy of Influences Model,” Mass Commun. Soc., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 389–410, 2016, doi: 10.1080/15205436.2016.1174268.

[31] S. Cunningham and D. Craig, “Online entertainment: A new wave of media globalization?,” Int. J. Commun., vol. 10, 2016.

[32] R. Schwartz and G. R. Halegoua, “The spatial self: Location-based identity performance on social media,” New media Soc., vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1643–1660, 2015.

[33] Y. Kim, Media, consumption, and everyday life in asia. New York: Routledge, 2008.

[34] A. Lenhart and M. Duggan, “COUPLES, THE INTERNET, AND SOCIAL MEDIA,” New York, 2014.

[35] N. Gane and D. Beer, New Media The Key Concept. Oxford and New York: Berg, 2008.

[36] S. Lecheler and S. Kruikemeier, “Re-evaluating journalistic routines in a digital age: A review of research on the use of online sources,” New media Soc., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 156–171, 2016.

[37] C. A. Scolari, “Mapping conversations about new media: the theoretical field of digital communication,” New media Soc., vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 943–964, 2009.

[38] M. Workman, “New media and the changing face of information technology use: The importance of task pursuit, social influence, and experience,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 31, pp. 111–117, 2014.

[39] R. K. Dash and A. K. Dash, “The new media and the promotion of ecological entrepreneurship,” Media Watch, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 419–431, 2019.

[40] D. Mathieu and A. Jorge, “The Datafication of Media (and) Audiences: An Introduction,” MedieKultur J. media Commun. Res., vol. 36, no. 69, 2020.

[41] D. Mathieu et al., “Stakeholder Collaboration in Audience Research: from Why to How,” Balt. Screen Media Rev., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 112–125, 2020.

[42] D. Mathieu et al., “Methodological challenges in the transition towards online audience research,” Particip. tions, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 289–320, 2016.

[43] M. H. Bornstein, “The specificity principle in acculturation science,” Perspect. Psychol. Sci., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 3–45, 2017.

[44] M. H. Bornstein and L. R. Cote, “Introduction to acculturation and parent–child relationships,” in Acculturation and parent-child relationships, Routledge, 2006, pp. 3–12.

[45] M. H. Bornstein, “Parenting in acculturation: two contemporary research designs and what they tell us,” Curr. Opin. Psychol., vol. 15, pp. 195–200, 2017.

[46] L. Kiang, T. Glatz, and C. M. Buchanan, “Developmental correlates of cultural parental self-efficacy among Asian and Latinx Parents,” J. Child Fam. Stud., vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 2563–2574, 2021.

[47] J. Boruszak-Kiziukiewicz and G. Kmita, “Parenting self-efficacy in immigrant families—A systematic review,” Front. Psychol., vol. 11, p. 985, 2020.

[48] T. R. Lindlof and B. C. Taylor, “Sensemaking: qualitative data analysis and interpretation,” Qual. Commun. Res. methods, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 241–281, 2011.

[49] N. W. Jankowski and K. B. Jensen, A handbook of qualitative methodologies for mass communication research. London: Routledge, 2002.

[50] D. Morley, Television, audiences and cultural studies. London and New York: Routledge, 2003.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Rizki Briandana, Nindyta Aisyah Dwityas, Putri Calista Mayde

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Communication and Society  
ISSN 2684-9267
Published by Association for Scientific Computing Electronics and Engineering (ASCEE)
W : http://pubs2.ascee.org/index.php/ijcs
E : dani@ascee.org

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats