(Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia)(2) Benni Setiawan
(Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia)(3) Chatia Hastasari
(National Chengchi University, Taiwan, Province of China)*corresponding author
AbstractThis article discusses religious and religious symbols narrated as political commodities in the 2019 presidential election on the twitter platform. The battle for narratives in the 2019 Indonesian presidential election was colored by the use of these issues on social media, this has led to increased sensitivity between religions and increasing issues of intolerance. For this reason this research has been conducted to investigate the categories of political messages narrated in tweets during the seven months of the 2019 presidential election campaign. Twitter, which was published on 23 September 2018 to 13 April 2019. based on the findings of this study, it shows that the success team of the two candidate pairs in narrating religious symbols and religious symbols is divided into 6 message categories. The message categories are Commodification of Religious Greetings, Clothing as a Religious Symbol, Title as a Religious Symbol, Salat and Nyekar as Political Commodities, An Expression of Gratitude as Political Commodities, House of Worship as a Place for Political Campaign.
KeywordsReligion Symbol; Religious Symbol; Campaign; Presidential Election; Twitter
|
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.31763/ijcs.v4i1.293 |
Article metrics10.31763/ijcs.v4i1.293 Abstract views : 1242 | PDF views : 453 |
Cite |
Full Text Download
|
References
[1] C. Hackett, S. Kramer, J. Marshall, A. F. Shi, and D. Fahmi, “The Age Gap in Religion Around the World | Pew Research Center,” no. February, 2018.
[2] J. Poushter, J. Fetterolf, and C. Tamir, “A Changing World: Global Views on Diversity, Gender Equality, Family Life and the Importance of Religion People see more diversity and gender equality happening but say family ties have weakened FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES,” vol. 22, no. April, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://www.pewresearch.org/global/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2019/04/Pew-Research-Center_Global-Views-of-Cultural-Change_2019-04-22.pdf.
[3] M. F. S. Ramadlan and R. Maskuri, “Marketing Simbol Keagamaan Dan Religius Dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Di Indonesia 2015-2018,” J. Penelit. Polit., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 249–265, 2018.
[4] A. Saputro, “Agama Dan Negara : Politik Identitas Menuju Pilpres 2019,” Asketik, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 111–120, 2018, doi: 10.30762/ask.v2i2.912.
[5] A. Sanusi and G. Gumilar, “Peran Ma’ruf Amin dalam Meraih Suara Masyarakat Muslim pada Pemilihan Presiden 2019,” Lentera, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 65–81, 2019.
[6] A. D. Ritonga and F. P. Adela, “Mencermati Populisme Prabowo Sebagai Bentuk Gaya Diskursif Saat Kampanye Politik Pada Pemilihan Presiden 2019,” Polit. J. Ilmu Polit., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2020, doi: 10.32734/politeia.v12i1.3170.
[7] E. Muhaemin and I. Sanusi, “Intoleransi Keagamaan Dalam Framing Surat Kabar Kompas,” Commun. J. Ilmu Komun., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 17–34, 2019, doi: 10.15575/cjik.v3i1.5034.
[8] U. Permana and I. Handriana, “Pengaruh Politisasi SARA Terhadap Tingkat Partisipasi Masyarakat Untuk Mengikuti Pemilihan Presiden Tahun 2019,” Syntax Lit. J. Ilm. Indones., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 126–134, 2020.
[9] R. S. Zuhro, “Democracy and the 2019 Election,” Lipi, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 14, 2019.
[10] A. R. Prasetia, “Pengaruh Politik Identitas Melalui Media Sosial Terhadap Generasi Milenial Dan Pelaksanaan Pemilu,” in Conference on Communication and New Media Studies, 2019, pp. 21–33.
[11] A. Kiftiyah, “Upaya Rekonsiliasi Politik Identitas Pasca Pelaksanaan Pemilu 2019 Di Indonesia Reconciliation Efforts of Identity Politics Post of Election 2019 in Indonesia,” J. Anal. Kebijak., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 63–75, 2019.
[12] D. Ardiyanti, A. M. G. P. Laia, and M. H. Nabiyyin, “Demokrasi, Penegakan Hukum dan Politik Identitas di Indonesia: Studi Kasus Minoritas Kaum Tionghoa dalam Kasus Meiliana,” Resolusi J. Sos. Polit., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 94–106, 2019, doi: 10.32699/resolusi.v2i2.974.
[13] A. Ardipandanto, “Dampak Politik Identitas Pada Pilpres 2019: Perspektif Populisme [The Impact of Identity Politics On President Election 2019: Populism Perspective],” J. Polit. Din. Masal. Polit. Dalam Negeri dan Hub. Int., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 43–63, 2020, doi: 10.22212/jp.v11i1.1582.
[14] F. L. W. Bukhroni and V. N. Aisyah, “Framing Kasus Ujaran Kebencian di Televisi,” J. Komun. Glob., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 80–96, 2020, doi: 10.24815/jkg.v9i1.15990.
[15] F. E. T. Sirait, “Ujaran Kebencian, Hoax dan Perilaku Memilih (Studi Kasus pada Pemilihan Presiden 2019 di Indonesia),” J. Penelit. Polit., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 179–190, 2019.
[16] S. Suharto, Kebijakan Pemerintah sebagai Manifestasi Peningkatan Toleransi Umat Beragama guna Mewujudkan Stabilitas Nasional dalam Rangka Ketahanan. 2017.
[17] KPU, “Visi Misi Pasangan Calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Pemilihan Umum Tahun 2019,” 2019.
[18] G. G. Heryanto, “Marketing Politik Di Media Massa Dalam Pemilu 2009,” KOMUNIKA J. Dakwah dan Komun., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 233–246, 2009, doi: 10.24090/komunika.v3i2.127.
[19] H. F. Siagian, “Pengaruh dan Efektivitas Penggunaan Media Sosial Sebagai Saluran Komunikasi Politik Dalam Membentuk Opini Publik,” Al-Khitabah, vol. 11, pp. 17–26, 2015.
[20] E. Anom, “Komunikasi politik SBY melalui media TV dan minat memilih masyarakat dalam Pilpres 2009,” POELITIK, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 511, 2005.
[21] D. Mulyana, Ilmu komunikasi : Suatu Pengantar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2007.
[22] H. Subiakto and R. Ida, Komunikasi Politik,Media dan Demokrasi. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2012.
[23] I. Ardelia and G. G. Sukendro, “Komunikasi Interaktif Nikon Ambassador Dalam Mempertahankan Citra Merek (Studi Kasus Akun Media Sosial Instagram @Sukiminthio),” Prologia, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 365, 2019, doi: 10.24912/pr.v3i2.6360.
[24] M. Rafi and H. M. Syam, “THE CAMPAIGN EFFECTIVENESS OF PARTAI SOLIDARITAS INDONESIA THROUGH SOCIAL MEDIA OF INSTAGRAM TOWARDS POLITICAL INTEREST OF YOUNG PEOPLE (CASE STUDY ON THE ADMINISTRATORS OF PARTAI SOLIDARITAS INDONESIA, REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVE COUNCIL OF BANDA ACEH CITY),” J. Ilm. Mhs. FISIP Unsyiah, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1–13, 2019.
[25] S. Valentina and T. Rahardjo, “Isu Identitas Etnis dan Agama Dalam Kontes Politik (Kasus Pemilihan Gubernur Sumatera Utara 2018),” Interak. Online, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/interaksi-online/article/view/24932.
[26] F. M. Putra, “RADIKALISASI ISU AGAMA DALAM PEMILIHAN GUBERNUR DAN WAKIL GUBERNUR DKI JAKARTA TAHUN 2017 Fariz,” J. Polit. Gov. Stud., vol. 8, no. 04, pp. 131–140, 2019.
[27] H. P. Achsa, “PENGGUNAAN INTERNET SEBAGAI PUBLIC SPHERE DALAM DEMOKRASI DELIBERATIF (Analisis Penggunaan Hashtag terkait Isu Politik Menjelang Pilpres 2019),” 2018.
[28] N. Hasfi, H. P. Santosa, and L. Triyono, “Twitter dan Pemilu di Indonesia: Propaganda di Ruang Publik Maya,” in Information and Communication Technology, dan Literasi Media Digital, 2015, p. 178, [Online]. Available: http://repository.wima.ac.id/14644/1/INFORMATION TECNOLOGI.pdf.
[29] W. J. Paisley and R. E. Rice, Public Communication Campaigns. London: SAGE Publications, 1981.
[30] E. M. Rogers and J. D. Storey, Handbook of communication science. 1987.
[31] KPU, “PKPU No. 23 Tahun 2018.”
[32] D. K. Berlo, “Communication as Process: Review and Commentary,” Ann. Int. Commun. Assoc., vol. 1, pp. 11–27, 1977.
[33] C. Cobuild, Dictionary Englsih Language. London: William Colins Sons And Col, 1987.
[34] J. Jery and D. Jery, Collins Directory of Sociology. Harper Collins Publishers, 1991.
[35] S. Solikhati, H. S. A. Putra, and H. Nugroho, “BANALITAS SIMBOL KEAGAMAAN DALAM SINETRON RELIGI : Analisis Tayangan Sinetron ‘ Bukan Islam KTP ’ di SCTV,” J. Ilmu Dakwah, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 96–117, 2015.
[36] M. Pateda, Semantik Leksikal. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2010.
[37] A. Sobur, Semiotika Komunikasi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2003.
[38] P. Tillich, “The Nature And The Significance Of Existentialist Thought,” in Journal of Philosophy, Inc., 1956, vol. 53, no. 23.
[39] F. . Dillistone, The Power Of Symbols In Religion And Culture. New York: Crossroad, 1986.
[40] R. Darojatun, “Tren Produk Halal, Gaya Hidup Syar’i dan Kesalehan Simbolik: Studi Tentang Muslim Kelas Menengah,” Wardah, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 135–157, 2018.
[41] A. N. Safri, “PERGESERAN MITOLOGI JILBAB (Dari Simbol Status ke Simbol Kesalehan / Keimanan),” Musawa, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 19–27, 2005.
[42] Firdaus, “Parade Iklan Politik Di Tahun Politik: Polarisasi Penggunaan Iklan Untuk Membangun Citra Menuju Pemilu 2014 Firdaus,” Turãst J. Penelit. Pengabdi., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 81–94, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://www.ejournal.uinib.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/turast/article/download/475/393.
[43] J. W. Creswell, Qualitative Inquiry And Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. London: SAGE Publications, 2007.
[44] N. K. Denzin, The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction To Sociological Methods. London: Routledge, 1978.
[45] W. . Neuman, Social Research Methods: Qualitative And Quantitative Approaches (7th ed). Boston: Pearson Education, 2011.
[46] S. Susanti, W. Erwina, and T. B. Putri, “Pesan Promosi Program Televisi dalam Akun Twitter @netmediatama,” Komuniti J. Komun. dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2020, doi: 10.23917/komuniti.v12i1.9634.
[47] D. I. Ayuningtias and E. Ci. S. Hartanto, “Pidato Politik di Indonesia: Sebuah Kajian Wacana Kritis,” Prosodi, vol. VIII (1), no. 1, pp. 25–38, 2014.
[48] A. Tumasjan, T. O. Sprenger, P. G. Sandner, and I. M. Welpe, “Election forecasts with Twitter: How 140 characters reflect the political landscape,” Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 402–418, 2011, doi: 10.1177/0894439310386557.
[49] A. Tumasjan, T. O. Sprenger, P. G. Sandner, and I. M. Welpe, “Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal about Political Sentiment Andranik,” in Proceedings of the Fourth Internatioan AAAI, 2004, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 455–479, doi: 10.15581/009.37.2.455-479.
[50] H. Lee and P. Kaak, “The Pedagogy of Shalom: Theory and Contemporary Issues of a Faith-Based Education,” Int. J. Christ. Educ., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 246–248, 2017, doi: 10.1177/2056997117729621.
[51] I. Syahputra, “AGAMA DI ERA MEDIA: Kode Religius dalam Industri Televisi Indonesia,” ESENSIA J. Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 125, 2016, doi: 10.14421/esensia.v17i1.1283.
[52] Muttaqin, P. Maulina, and S. Fadhlain, “Citra Politik Prabowo-Sandi Dalam Pemilihan Presiden (Pilpres) 2019 Di Akun Media Sosial Instagram,” Interak. J. Ilmu Komun., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 40–50, 2020, doi: 10.14710/interaksi.9.1.40-50.
[53] D. Hadiwijaya, “Kopiah/Peci sebagai Salah Satu Atribut Identitas Bangsa Indonesia,” J. Appl. Sci., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 031–040, 2019, doi: 10.36870/japps.v1i2.50.
[54] A. Malik and A. Batubara, “Komodifikasi Agama dalam Ruang Politik di Seberang Kota Jambi Religion Commodification in Political Activities in Seberang Kota Jambi,” Kontekstualita, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 99–114, 2014.
[55] I. Santoso, “Tradisi, Bentuk, Nilai dan Identitas Desain Produk Abad 19-20,” Panggung, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 144–154, 2014, doi: 10.26742/panggung.v24i2.113.
[56] A. F. A.R, “Pesan dakwah dalam film sang kiai (analisis semiotika),” 2015.
[57] A. N. Fitri and Adeni, “Jokowi dan Kekuatan Pencitraan Diri serta Relasinya dengan Umat Islam,” Alhadharah, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 1651–17, 2020, doi: 10.18592/alhadharah.v19i2.3503.
[58] F. Qorib and M. Saleh, “Anti Islam hingga Dekat Emak-Emak: Perang Citra Jokowi dan Prabowo pada Pemilihan Presiden 2019,” J. Komun. Glob., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 187–208, 2020, doi: 10.24815/jkg.v9i2.17246.
[59] A. Afriadi, G. F. Prisanto, N. F. Ernungtyas, I. Irwansyah, and A. L. Afriani, “Komunikasi Politik ‘Rasa’ Ala Jokowi Dalam Merespon Politik Sentimen,” WACANA J. Ilm. Ilmu Komun., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 142–153, 2019, doi: 10.32509/wacana.v18i2.928.
[60] C. Maulana, “Ritual ‘Nyekar’, Cultural Capital, Dan Mobilitas Politik Di Indramayu,” RIGHT J. Agama dan Hak Azazi Mns., vol. 4, no. 2, 2015, [Online]. Available: http://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/syariah/inright/article/view/1285.
[61] M. I. Z. Zebua, “Peran Media Sosial Twitter Dalam Persaingan Politik Pemilihan Presiden 2019,” J. Cendekia Waskita, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 378–392, 2019.
[62] M. Choy, M. L. F. Cheong, M. N. Laik, and K. P. Shung, “A sentiment analysis of Singapore Presidential Election 2011 using Twitter data with census correction,” 2011, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1108.5520.
[63] M. Choy, M. L. F. Cheong, M. N. Laik, and K. P. Shung, “US Presidential Election 2012 Prediction using Census Corrected Twitter Model,” arXiv Prepr. arXiv, 2012.
[64] N. H. Nasution and Wijaya, “MANAJEMEN MASJID PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID 19,” Manaj. Masjid Pada Masa Pandemi Covid 19, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 1, 2020.
[65] Siskandar and A. Yani, “OPTIMALISASI FUNGSI MASJID UNTUK KEAKTIFAN MAHASISWA,” Alim J. Islam. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 85–100, 2020.
[66] A. R. Tampenawas, “Pandangan Eklesiologi Calvin mengenai Politik Praktis dalam Pelayanan Gereja,” THRONOS: Jurnal Teologi Kristen, vol. 1, no. 2. pp. 115–126, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://e-journal.bmptkki.org/index.php/thronos.
[67] R. A. Kusuma, “Media Baru dan Jurnalisme Warga: Sebagai Sumber ‘ Hoax’ dan ‘ Black Campaign’ pada Agenda Politik,” vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 134–151, 2019.
[68] P. V. D. Bergh, Ethnicity and Nationalism: Theory and Comparison. London: SAGE Publications, 1991.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Febriansyah Kulau, Benni Setiawan, Chatia Hastasari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
International Journal of Communication and Society
ISSN 2684-9267
Published by Association for Scientific Computing Electronics and Engineering (ASCEE)
W : http://pubs2.ascee.org/index.php/ijcs
E : dani@ascee.org
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.