(Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Indonesia. Shanghai University, China)(2) Liu Jian
(Hebei Radio and Television Station, China)(3) * Panqiang Niu
(Shanghai University, China)*corresponding author
AbstractThe pros and cons of the project of BRI in Indonesia cannot be separated from mainstream and online mass media coverage in Indonesia. In the coverage, there is a framing to build a story so that the influence of journalists is so great that the news is read by the public. In addition, the informant factor as well as ideology influence the news statements that appeared in the media. This research focuses on how the construction of the mass media coverage in Indonesia, especially the new media (online news) related to the cooperation between Indonesian and Chinese government in the BRI project. The research uses a qualitative descriptive approach and framing analysis. The research object is the official portal of online news such as Media Indonesia.com. Republika.com Kompas.com, and Jawapos.com. Based on the results of research and discussion, it can be concluded that the framing of online media coverage Kompas.com, mediaindonesia.com, jawapos.com and Republika.com have differences. Kompas.com and jawapos.com put more emphasis on scientific and intellectual language because both of their readers have a better level of education and economics. Whereas republika.com and mediaindonesia.com tend to use straightforward and simple language. Kompas.com and jawapos.com lead opinions to think critically with data while republika.com and mediaindonesia.com leads the public to see the implementation of Indonesia's and China economic cooperation programs in the BRI project. KeywordsFraming, Online Media, BRI, Media Views in Indonesia
|
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.31763/ijcs.v5i1.1019 |
Article metrics10.31763/ijcs.v5i1.1019 Abstract views : 853 | PDF views : 311 |
Cite |
Full Text Download
|
References
[1] N. Kamrany, “China’s Rise to Global Economic Superpower,” Huffington Post, 2015. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nake-m-kamrany/chinas-rise-to-global-eco_b_6544924.html (accessed Dec. 20, 2020).
[2] G. Junxian and M. Yan, “China’s New Silk Road: Where Does It Lead?,” Asian Perspect., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 105–130, 2016, doi: 10.1353/apr.2016.0004.
[3] I. Imomnazar, “Impact of «One Belt, One Road» Initiatives to The Economy of Central Asian Countries,” Int. J. Bus. Econ. Dev., vol. 06, no. 02, pp. 29–36, 2018, doi: 10.24052/ijbed/v06nu02/art-03.
[4] M. D. Swaine, “Chinese Views and Commentary on the One Belt, One Road Initiative,” China Leadersh. Monit., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 1–24, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://www.hoover.org/sites/default/files/research/docs/clm47ms.pdf
[5] S. Chen, “The Chinese Belt And Road Initiative: A Framing Analysis Of BRI Coverage In The People’s Daily,” Tilburg University, 2018.
[6] U. K. Anunne, P. N. Phuong Thuy, J. T. Yin Yan, and Y. Lifeng, “Framing Analysis of Belt and Road Initiative Coverage in Major Nigerian, Malaysian, and Vietnamese Newspapers,” Eur. Sci. J. ESJ, vol. 15, no. 29, pp. 1–20, 2019, doi: 10.19044/esj.2019.v15n29p1.
[7] H. Haiqing, “China’s Image in the Belt and Road Initiative: Case Study of Pakistan and India,” Lund University, 2018.
[8] M. Laruelle, China’s Belt and Road Initiative and Its Impact in Central Asia. Washington DC: Central Asia Program, 2018.
[9] R. Geethanjali, Nataraj and Sekhani, “China’s One Belt One Road, An Indian Perspective.,” Econ. Polit. Weekly, vol. 50, no. 49, p. 67, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://www.epw.in/journal/2015/49/notes/chinas-one-belt-one-road.html.
[10] A. et al. Bondaz, “One Belt, One Road: China’s Great Leap Outward,” 2015.
[11] S. Djankov, Simeone & Miner, China’s Belt and Road Initiative-Motives, Scope, and Challenges. New York: Peterson Institute for International Economics., 2016.
[12] Z. Minghao, “China’s New Silk Road Initiative,” Roma, 37, 2015.
[13] C. Marnani, Sri. Rumambi, F. Johanes, Simatupang, and Haposan, “Connectivity Indonesia’s Maritime Global Axis Policy,” J. Pertahanan, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 53–70, 2016.
[14] J. W. Creswell, Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Los Angeles: Sage Publication, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.ptonline.com/articles/how-to-get-better-mfi-results
[15] T. Kuhn, Tthe Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Chichago Press, 1970.
[16] D. McQuail, “Reflections on Paradigm Change in Communication Theory and Research University of Amsterdam,” vol. 7, pp. 216–229, 2013.
[17] D. Barrat, “Media sociology; The Dominant Paradigm,” Media Sociol., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1–138, 2008, doi: 10.4324/9780203136317.
[18] R. M. Entman, Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press., 2003.
[19] R. M. Entman, “Framing bias: Media in the Distribution of Power,” J. Commun., vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 163–173, 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00336.x.
[20] P. and L. Berger, The social construction of “religion” and its limits: A critical reading of Timothy Fitzgerald, vol. 24, no. 2. USA: Penguin Press, 1991. doi: 10.1163/157006812X634872.
[21] E. Susanti, “Critical Discourse Analysis: Hegemony of the Social Media Twitter About National Issues in Indonesia and its Implications to the Discourse Analysis Subject in Colleges,” TARBIYA J. Educ. Muslim Soc., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 153–166, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.15408/tjems.v2i2.3180.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Anang Masduki
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
International Journal of Communication and Society
ISSN 2684-9267
Published by Association for Scientific Computing Electronics and Engineering (ASCEE)
W : http://pubs2.ascee.org/index.php/ijcs
E : dani@ascee.org
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.