Developing a delay risk model for toll road construction project: A conceptual framework

(1) * G A Pratama Mail (Civil Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty , Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia)
(2) Y Latief Mail (Civil Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia)
*corresponding author

Abstract


In the realization of the medium-term development plan in 2014-2019 (RPJMN), toll road construction development was only reached 51 percent. construction projects had complex and dynamic nature, which caused delays, construction risk assessment that considers risk as a system was done before, for example, using techniques such as SD, Fuzzy DEMATEL, STEEP-SD, DEMATEL-ANP, and SD-DEMATEL, but the technique still has some shortcomings. in indonesia, research related to this matter is still rarely done, to address this concern, we propose a conceptual framework that can be used to develop a delay risk model for toll road construction project especially in indonesia. for this purpose, we introduce the system dynamic-fuzzy dematel-anp (sd-fdanp) method. the results of the development of the sd-fdanp method can be used as a guideline that can help achieve behavioral knowledge of delays and the success of risk assessment in toll road infrastructure development projects.

Keywords


Risk assessment; Toll road infrastructure; Construction; Model development; Analysis

   

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31763/aet.v1i2.676
      

Article metrics

10.31763/aet.v1i2.676 Abstract views : 1090 | PDF views : 392

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

References


[1] M. A. Wibowo et al., Risk Management in Indonesia Construction Project: A Case Study of a Toll Road Project. IntechOpen, pp. 121-138, 2018. [Online]. Available at: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/62555.

[2] P. McCawley, “Infrastructure Policy in Indonesia, 1965–2015: A Survey,” Bull. Indones. Econ. Stud., vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 263–285, May 2015, doi: 10.1080/00074918.2015.1061916.

[3] A. Makmur, W. Santosa, and A. C. Sutandi, “Performance Indicators Development for Toll Road Minimum Services Standards in Indonesia,” Int. J. Integr. Eng., vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 292–302, Dec. 2019. [Online]. Available at: https://publisher.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/ijie/article/view/5330.

[4] “PERPRES No. 18 of 2020 concerning the National Medium Term Development Plan for 2020-2024.” [Online]. Available at: https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/131386/perpres-no-18-tahun-2020.

[5] N. J. Smith, T. Merna, P. Jobling, and S. Thompson, Managing risk in construction projects, 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons p. 254, 2014. [Online]. Available at: https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Managing_Risk.

[6] B. I. Al Hadithi, “An investigation into factors causing delays in highway construction projects in iraq,” in MATEC Web of Conferences, Mar. 2018, vol. 162, p. 02035, doi: 10.1051/MATECCONF/201816202035.

[7] R. F. Aziz and A. A. Abdel-Hakam, “Exploring delay causes of road construction projects in Egypt,” Alexandria Eng. J., vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 1515–1539, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1016/J.AEJ.2016.03.006.

[8] S. M. El-Sayegh and M. H. Mansour, “Risk Assessment and Allocation in Highway Construction Projects in the UAE,” J. Manag. Eng., vol. 31, no. 6, p. 04015004, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000365.

[9] Mahmoud Mohamed Mahmoud Sharaf and Hassan T. Abdelwahab, “Analysis of Risk Factors for Highway Construction Projects in Egypt,” J. Civ. Eng. Archit., vol. 9, no. 5, May 2015, doi: 10.17265/1934-7359/2015.05.004.

[10] H. Suliantoro, N. Fitriani, and B. H. Setiadji, “Risk analysis and strategic planning on bridge construction works at the toll road procurement projects in Central Java Province,” in SHS Web of Conferences, 2018, vol. 49, p. 02020, doi: 10.1051/SHSCONF/20184902020.

[11] A. Tawalare, “Identification of Risks for Indian Highway Construction,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Feb. 2019, vol. 471, no. 10, p. 102003, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/471/10/102003.

[12] P. Thapanont, C. Santi, and X. Pruethipong, “Causes of delay on highway construction projects in Thailand,” in MATEC Web of Conferences, Aug. 2018, vol. 192, p. 02014, doi: 10.1051/MATECCONF/201819202014.

[13] F. R. Willett et al., “Analysis of Risk Assessment in Highway Projects Using Importance Index,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 1116, no. 1, p. 012157, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/1116/1/012157.

[14] A. J. Perrenoud, J. B. Smithwick, K. C. Hurtado, and K. T. Sullivan, “Project Risk Distribution during the Construction Phase of Small Building Projects,” J. Manag. Eng., vol. 32, no. 3, p. 04015050, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000417.

[15] Ö. Ökmen and A. Öztaş, “Construction Project Network Evaluation with Correlated Schedule Risk Analysis Model,” J. Constr. Eng. Manag., vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 49–63, Jan. 2008, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:1(49).

[16] C. Fang and F. Marle, “A simulation-based risk network model for decision support in project risk management,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 635–644, Feb. 2012, doi: 10.1016/J.DSS.2011.10.021.

[17] C. Fang, F. Marle, E. Zio, and J. C. Bocquet, “Network theory-based analysis of risk interactions in large engineering projects,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., vol. 106, pp. 1–10, Oct. 2012, doi: 10.1016/J.RESS.2012.04.005.

[18] F. Nasirzadeh, A. Afshar, and M. Khanzadi, “Dynamic risk analysis in construction projects,” Can. J. Civ. Eng., vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 820–831, Aug. 2008, doi: 10.1139/L08-035.

[19] F. Nasirzadeh, M. Khanzadi, and M. Rezaie, “Dynamic modeling of the quantitative risk allocation in construction projects,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 442–451, Apr. 2014, doi: 10.1016/J.IJPROMAN.2013.06.002.

[20] P. Boateng, Z. Chen, S. Ogunlana, and D. Ikediashi, “A system dynamics approach to risks description in megaprojects development,” Organ. Technol. Manag. Constr. An Int. J., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 593–603, 2012, doi: 10.5592/otmcj.2012.3.3.

[21] G. Dedasht, R. M. Zin, M. S. Ferwati, M. M. Abdullahi, A. Keyvanfar, and R. McCaffer, “Dematel-Anp Risk Assessment in Oil and Gas Construction Projects,” Sustain. 2017, Vol. 9, Page 1420, vol. 9, no. 8, p. 1420, Aug. 2017, doi: 10.3390/SU9081420.

[22] S. M. Hatefi and J. Tamošaitienė, “An integrated fuzzy DEMATEL-fuzzy ANP model for evaluating construction projects by considering interrelationships among risk factors,” J. Civ. Eng. Manag., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 114–131, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.3846/JCEM.2019.8280.

[23] M. P. Jalal and S. Shoar, “A hybrid SD-DEMATEL approach to develop a delay model for construction projects,” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 629–651, 2017, doi: 10.1108/ECAM-02-2016-0056/FULL/XML.

[24] L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Inf. Control, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338–353, Jun. 1965, doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.

[25] A. Q. Ansari and J. M. Islamia, “The Basics of Fuzzy Logic :A Tutorial Review,” Comput. 88, no. June, pp. 5–9, 2015. [Online]. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278031775.

[26] J. W. Forrester, “System dynamics, systems thinking, and soft OR,” Syst. Dyn. Rev., vol. 10, no. 2–3, pp. 245–256, Jun. 1994, doi: 10.1002/SDR.4260100211.

[27] J. Sterman, Business Dynamics-Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 472-473, 2011. [Online]. Available at: https://books.google.com/books/.

[28] R. Merker, W. Schwarz, H. Schreiber, and T. Zlateva, Thinking in Systems, vol. 69, no. 1. pp. 151-152, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.aeue.2014.08.008.

[29] A. Jayant, Neeru, and A. Agarwal, “A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on DEMATEL, AHP and TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1240, no. 1, p. 012010, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1240/1/012010.

[30] X. Zheng et al., “Analysis of Driving Factors for Extended Producer Responsibility by Using Interpretative Structure Modelling (ISM) and Analytic Network Process (ANP),” Sustain. 2017, Vol. 9, Page 540, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 540, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.3390/SU9040540.

[31] T. L. Saaty, “Decision making — the Analytic Hierarchy and Network Processes (AHP/ANP),” J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 2004 131, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–35, Mar. 2004, doi: 10.1007/S11518-006-0151-5.

[32] J. W. Forrester, System Dynamics and the Lessons of 35 Years. Springer, Boston, MA, pp. 199–240, 1993, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-3226-2_7.

[33] M. Rostamnezhad, F. Nasirzadeh, M. Khanzadi, M. J. Jarban, and M. Ghayoumian, “Modeling social sustainability in construction projects by integrating system dynamics and fuzzy‐DEMATEL method: a case study of highway project,” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag., vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 1595–1618, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1108/ECAM-01-2018-0031/FULL/XML.

[34] L. B. Sweeney and J. D. Sterman, “Bathtub dynamics: initial results of a systems thinking inventory,” Syst. Dyn. Rev., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 249–286, Dec. 2000, doi: 10.1002/SDR.198.

[35] R. Kiani Mavi and C. Standing, “Critical success factors of sustainable project management in construction: A fuzzy DEMATEL-ANP approach,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 194, pp. 751–765, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2018.05.120


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 G A Pratama, Y Latief

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Applied Engineering and Technology
ISSN: 2829-4998
Email: aet@ascee.org | andri.pranolo.id@ieee.org
Published by: Association for Scientic Computing Electronics and Engineering (ASCEE)
Organized by: Association for Scientic Computing Electronics and Engineering (ASCEE), Universitas Negeri Malang, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

View My Stats AET
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.