Visual semiotics in the structure of Kufic calligraphy

(1) * Kaddour Abdallah Tani Mail (Department of Information & Communication Sciences, University of Oran 1 Ahmed Benbella, Algeria)
*corresponding author

Abstract


In the aesthetic study, semiotic interpretation is an intellectual approach to deciphering the hidden meaning of an aesthetic achievement's taste. The study's goals include comprehending the artwork's structure, which necessitates an in-depth interpretation of the language by translating it into official symbols. This research method uses a linear formation sample with semantic attributes attached to the Kufic calligraphy of artworks. The findings reveal that the emergence of geometric lines in a linear composition has a decorative abstraction that may be used to argue that the artist intended to place it there and that this is a symbol of the cosmos and its existence. This study adds to our understanding of compositional insight in Arabic calligraphy as an expressive aesthetic expression that alludes to the text in the sense of meaning that lies underneath the direct meaning

Keywords


Visual Semiotics; Kufic calligraphy; Semiotic interpretation; Structure of Kufic; Linear Formations

   

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31763/viperarts.v3i2.516
      

Article metrics

10.31763/viperarts.v3i2.516 Abstract views : 1482 | PDF views : 647

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

References


[1] D. M. Alashari, A. R. Hamzah, and N. Marni, “Islamic Art and Language as a Source of Inspiration Leading to Traditional Arabic Calligraphy Art,” Umr. J. Islam. Civilizational Stud., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 33–45, 2019.

[2] D. M. Alashari, “The aesthetics of calligraphy art in the Kiswah of the Kaaba,” Int. J. Art Des., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 28–33, 2021.

[3] A. H. Hataf and M. S. Jabr, “The Aesthetics of the Decorative Composition of the Basmalah in Contemporary Arab Painting,” PalArch’s J. Archaeol. Egypt/Egyptology, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 3637–3650, 2020.

[4] M. Mahdiyeh, “Calligraphy as Graphically Autonomous Form: A Corpus Study of Persian Calligraphic Letterforms Using a Multimodal Approach,” in The Materiality of Writing, Routledge, 2017, pp. 229–264.

[5] A. A. Berger, “Semiotics and society,” Society, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 22–26, 2014.

[6] J. R. DiLeo, “Charles S. Peirce and the Rhetoric of Science,” Semiotics, pp. 137–150, 1994.

[7] J. Martinet, “The Semiotics of Luis Jorge Prieto,” in The Semiotic Web 1989, De Gruyter Mouton, 2011, pp. 89–108.

[8] N. Everaert-Desmedt, “Peirce’s semiotics,” in An Introduction to Applied Semiotics, Routledge, 2019, pp. 241–249.

[9] T. Burge, “Iconic representation: Maps, pictures, and perception,” in The map and the territory, Springer, 2018, pp. 79–100.

[10] L. Radford, “Signs and meanings in students’ emergent algebraic thinking: A semiotic analysis,” Educ. Stud. Math., vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 237–268, 2000.

[11] N. Nørgaard, “The semiotics of typography in literary texts. A multimodal approach,” Orb. Litt., vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 141–160, 2009.

[12] G. Kress, “Against arbitrariness: The social production of the sign as a foundational issue in critical discourse analysis,” Discourse Soc., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 169–191, 1993.

[13] M. Van Manen, “Phenomenological pedagogy and the question of meaning,” Phenomenol. Educ. discourse, pp. 41–68, 1997.

[14] S. Oliva, “Eco and Berio between Music and Open Work,” Riv. Estet., no. 76, pp. 146–161, 2021.

[15] N. Abdel Halim, “Conceptual Typography Between form Significance and Persuasion,” J. Des. Sci. Appl. Arts, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 108–119, 2020.

[16] Y.-H. Hubert Tsai, L.-K. Huang, and R. Salakhutdinov, “Learning robust visual-semantic embeddings,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International conference on Computer Vision, 2017, pp. 3571–3580.

[17] P. Li and L. Gleitman, “Turning the tables: Language and spatial reasoning,” Cognition, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 265–294, 2002.

[18] L. Prager, “Introduction. Reshaping tribal identities in the contemporary Arab world: politics,(self-) representation, and the construction of Bedouin history,” Nomad. People., pp. 10–15, 2014.

[19] H. Satzinger, “Syllabic and Alphabetic Script, or the Egyptian Origin of the Alphabet,” Syllabic Alph. Script, or Egypt. Orig. Alph., pp. 1000–1012, 2002.

[20] T. Olive and J.-M. Passerault, “The visuospatial dimension of writing,” Writ. Commun., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 326–344, 2012.

[21] J. A. Vanegas, V. Beltrán, H. J. Escalante, and F. A. González, “Transductive non-linear semantic embedding for multi-class classification,” Pattern Recognit. Lett., vol. 128, pp. 370–377, 2019.

[22] W. M. K. Shaw, “The Islam in Islamic art history: secularism and public discourse,” J. Art Hist., no. 6, p. 1, 2012.

[23] H. Dreyfuss, “Visual communication: A study of symbols,” SAE Trans., pp. 364–370, 1970.

[24] C. Moussavi-Aghdam, “Art History,‘National Art’and Iranian Intellectuals in the 1960s,” Br. J. Middle East. Stud., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 132–150, 2014.

[25] Z. Karadag, “Euclidean Exploration of Geometry in Islamic Art,” in Transdisciplinarity in Mathematics Education, Springer, 2018, pp. 3–24.

[26] G. Sonesson, “The concept of text in cultural semiotics,” Σημειωτκή-Sign Syst. Stud., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 83–114, 1998.

[27] C. Corradi, “Text, context and individual meaning: Rethinking life stories in a hermeneutic framework,” Discourse Soc., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 105–118, 1991.

[28] R. Patel, S. Pilato, and D. Roy, “Beyond Linear Syntax: An Image-Oriented Communication Aid.,” Assist. Technol. Outcomes Benefits, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 57–66, 2004.

[29] Y. Li, “Calligraphy Education in Teaching Chinese as a Second Language,” Palgrave Handb. Chinese Lang. Stud., pp. 1–29, 2020.

[30] M. J. Khajavi, “Kinesthetic Behaviors,” in Arabic Script in Motion, Springer, 2019, pp. 39–79.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Kaddour Abdallah Tani

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

___________________________________________________________
International Journal of Visual and Performing Arts
ISSN 2684-9259
Published by Association for Scientific Computing Electronics and Engineering (ASCEE)
W: http://pubs2.ascee.org/index.php/viperarts
E: sularso@ascee.org
Organized by:

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0

Viperarts Stats