Audience and Social Criticism in Sisir Tanah Songs

(1) * Anang Masduki Mail (Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta, Indonesia)
(2) Panqiang Niu Mail (Shanghai University of China, China)
(3) Rr. Octa Dwina Fauzia Mail (Universitas Ahmad Dahlan Yogyakarta, Indonesia)
*corresponding author


This research focuses on social criticism in an environment that is reflected in the lyrics of Sisir Tanah songs. The songs of Sisir Tanah are entirely focused on highlighting social issues, especially the environment in today's society. The purpose of this study is to describe audience reception as a resource person on how to see the role of Sisir Tanah songs as media to convey messages of social criticism. This research uses a descriptive qualitative method with a reception analysis method. The primary data is taken from the two songs of Sisir Tanah, namely Hidup and Bebal. The following data is obtained from interviews from several sources, journals, books, and the internet. The researcher also uses an interdisciplinary approach as a method of communication science studies whose lyrics are delivered by Sisir Tanah in the music media, social criticism theory, which describes Sisir Tanah into the category of social criticism in the environment, and the theory of respect analysis, which is the basis of the interview result of several speakers in interpreting the songs of Sisir Tanah. The results of this study show that social criticism through music media, in this case, is a song, is quite useful. Because the five speakers: Labib, Riska, Dedy, Sonnia, and Fachri, feel the social critique message delivered by Sisir Tanah through music becomes active when the listeners of the music can receive the message conveyed, as well as the effects obtained by the five speakers.


Audience; Sisir Tanah; Social Criticism; Mass Communication; Musical Communication



Article metrics

10.31763/viperarts.v2i2.173 Abstract views : 373 | PDF views : 138




Full Text



F. Setyaningrum, H. Siswantari, L. L. Simatupang, and P. D. Fitriasari, “Hidden Curriculum Design of Traditional Art Community Rampak Kendang,” Int. J. Vis. Perform. Arts, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 90–97, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.31763/viperarts.v1i2.65.

J. Anderson and A. D. Kincaid, “Media Subservience and Satirical Subversiveness: The Daily Show , The Colbert Report , The Propaganda Model and the Paradox of Parody,” Crit. Stud. Media Commun., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 171–188, Aug. 2013, doi: 10.1080/15295036.2013.771276.

C. Hoedemaekers, “Creative work and affect: Social, political and fantasmatic dynamics in the labour of musicians,” Hum. Relations, vol. 71, no. 10, pp. 1348–1370, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1177/0018726717741355.

S. McClary, “Towards a Feminist Criticism of Music,” Can. Univ. Music Rev., vol. 10, no. 2, p. 9, 1990, doi: 10.7202/1014882ar.

R. Weitzman, “An Introduction to Adorno’s Music and Social Criticism,” Music Lett., vol. LII, no. 3, pp. 287–298, 1971, doi: 10.1093/ml/LII.3.287.

B. Klein, “Dancing About Architecture: Popular Music Criticism and the Negotiation of Authority,” Pop. Commun., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–20, Feb. 2005, doi: 10.1207/s15405710pc0301_1.

J. Haynes, “World music and the search for difference,” Ethnicities, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 365–385, Sep. 2005, doi: 10.1177/1468796805054961.

Rees, “Environmental Crisis, Culture Loss, and a New Musical Aesthetic: China’s ‘Original Ecology Folksongs’ In Theory and Practice,” Ethnomusicology, vol. 60, no. 1, p. 53, 2016, doi: 10.5406/ethnomusicology.60.1.0053.

A. Cohen and S. L. Rosenhaus, “Folk music: the basics,” in Writing Musical Theater, New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2006, pp. 3–13.

H. Nassaji, “Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis,” Lang. Teach. Res., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 129–132, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1177/1362168815572747.

B. MacGregor and D. E. Morrison, “From focus groups to editing groups: a new method of reception analysis,” Media, Cult. Soc., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 141–150, Jan. 1995, doi: 10.1177/016344395017001009.

S. Q. Qu and J. Dumay, “The qualitative research interview,” Qual. Res. Account. Manag., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 238–264, Aug. 2011, doi: 10.1108/11766091111162070.

I. Etikan, “Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling,” Am. J. Theor. Appl. Stat., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 1, 2016, doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11.

D. A. Bell, “Communitarianism,” in Wiley Encyclopedia of Management, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2015, pp. 1–3.

V. Tohar, M. Asaf, A. Kainan, and R. Shahar, “An Alternative Approach for Personal Narrative Interpretation: The Semiotics of Roland Barthes,” Int. J. Qual. Methods, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 57–70, Sep. 2007, doi: 10.1177/160940690700600306.

P. Franklin, “Audiences, Critics and the Depurification of Music: Reflections on a 1920s Controversy,” J. R. Music. Assoc., vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 80–91, Jan. 1989, doi: 10.1093/jrma/114.1.80.

L. C. Li, J. M. Grimshaw, C. Nielsen, M. Judd, P. C. Coyte, and I. D. Graham, “Evolution of Wenger’s concept of community of practice,” Implement. Sci., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 11, Dec. 2009, doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-11.

J. Graff Zivin and M. Neidell, “Environment, Health, and Human Capital,” J. Econ. Lit., vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 689–730, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1257/jel.51.3.689.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Anang Masduki, Panqiang Niu, Rr. Octa Dwina Fauzia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Visual and Performing Arts
ISSN 2684-9259
Published by Association for Scientific Computing  Electronics and Engineering (ASCEE)
E :
Organized by:

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0

Viperarts Stats