How ready we are? The temporary evacuation shelter (TES) and routes distance during the September 2018 earthquake based on survivor's preference
(1) * Amar Akbar Ali Mail (Architecture Department, Engineering Faculty, Tadulako University, Indonesia)
(2) Rifai Mardin Mail (Architecture Department, Engineering Faculty, Tadulako University, Indonesia)
(3) Alifi Yunar Mail (Civil Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty, Tadulako University, Indonesia)
(4) Y A Rahman Mail (Electrical Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty, Tadulako University, Indonesia)
*corresponding author

Abstract


During Palu earthquake on September 28 2018, people in the coastline area immediately evacuates to decent heights locations. Their action preference is purely based on the aim of surviving the tsunami events. This research is aim on identify, in that conditions, how the survival chooses the TES and their route to it. This research also seeking their preference of TES and Evacuation route during the normal conditions, and compare the survival preference and what is happened during the tsunami events in September 2018. The result shows that during the tsunami disaster events, only 5 out of 74 survivals preferred evacuate to the higher buildings around the coastline within te tsunami prone area, while the others preferred to move further to the higher ground on the city centre. Majority of the survivals failed to understand the important of shortened their route as what is standard demanded.

   

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31763/aet.v2i1.688 		      

Article metrics

10.31763/aet.v2i1.688 Abstract views : 1094 | PDF views : 413

   

Cite

How to cite item
   

Full Text

Download

References


[1] V. Sotiris, G. Athanassios, T. Varvara, and B. Aggeliki, “A preliminary report on the M7.5 Palu 2018 earthquake co-seismic ruptures and landslides using image correlation techniques on optical satellite data,” Oct. 2018, doi: 10.5281/ZENODO.1467128.

[2] “Kecamatan Palu Timur Dalam Angka 2018,” 2018. Available at : palukota.bps.go.id.

[3] A. A. Anggarda, H. Purnaweni, S. Suwitri, and T. Afrizal, “Analysis of Flood Disaster Mitigation Policy in Lamongan District,” Int. J. Soc. Sci. Bus., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 537–542, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.23887/IJSSB.V5I4.37978.

[4] J. Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota et al., “Analisis Kerentanan Bencana Tsunami Di Kota Palu,” SPASIAL, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 432–439, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.35793/SP.V6I2.25325.

[5] S. J. Scheer, V. Varela, and G. Eftychidis, “A generic framework for tsunami evacuation planning,” Phys. Chem. Earth, Parts A/B/C, vol. 49, pp. 79–91, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1016/J.PCE.2011.12.001.

[6] F. Løvholt et al., “Tsunami risk reduction – are we better prepared today than in 2004?,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., vol. 10, no. PA, pp. 127–142, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.1016/J.IJDRR.2014.07.008.

[7] X. Zhu and B. Sun, “Study on earthquake risk reduction from the perspectives of the elderly,” Saf. Sci., vol. 91, pp. 326–334, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1016/J.SSCI.2016.08.028.

[8] W. Widiyanto, P. B. Santoso, S. C. Hsiao, and R. T. Imananta, “Post-event field survey of 28 September 2018 Sulawesi earthquake and tsunami,” Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 2781–2794, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.5194/NHESS-19-2781-2019.

[9] S. Hettiarachchi, “Establishing the Indian Ocean Tsunami Warning and Mitigation System for human and environmental security,” Procedia Eng., vol. 212, pp. 1339–1346, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1016/J.PROENG.2018.01.173.

[10] N. Husa and A. Damayanti, “Evacuation route and evacuation shelter planning for tsunami hazard in Pangandaran District,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 311, no. 1, p. 012023, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/311/1/012023.

[11] S. Kongsomsaksakul, G. Student, C. Yang, and A. Chen, “Shelter Location-Allocation Model For Flood Evacuation Planning,” J. East. Asia Soc. Transp. Stud., vol. 6, pp. 4237–4252, 2005, doi: 10.11175/EASTS.6.4237.

[12] R. Swamy, J. E. Kang, R. Batta, and Y. Chung, “Hurricane evacuation planning using public transportation,” Socioecon. Plann. Sci., vol. 59, pp. 43–55, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1016/J.SEPS.2016.10.009.

[13] M. Fedryansyah, H. Bekti, and R. Pancasilawan, “The Implementation Of Disaster Mitigation Plan Through Structural Functional Approach,” Sosiohumaniora, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 375–381, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.24198/SOSIOHUMANIORA.V22I3.25750.

[14] L. D. Han, F. Yuan, S. M. Chin, and H. Hwang, “Global Optimization of Emergency Evacuation Assignments,” vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 502–513, Dec. 2006, doi: 10.1287/INTE.1060.0251.

[15] F. Makinoshima, F. Imamura, and Y. Abe, “Behavior from Tsunami Recorded in the Multimedia Sources at Kesennuma City in the 2011 Tohoku Tsunami and Its Simulation by Using the Evacuation Model with Pedestrian—Car Interaction,”, vol. 58, no. 4, p. 1640023, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1142/S0578563416400234.

[16] R. Mardin and Z. Shen, “Behavior from tsunami recorded in the multimedia sources at Kesennuma City in the 2011 Tohoku Tsunami and its simulation by using the evacuation model with pedestrian-car interaction,” 日本建築学会技術報告集, vol. 26, no. 62, pp. 319–324, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.3130/AIJT.26.319.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Amar Akbar Ali, Rifai Mardin, Alifi Yunar, Y A Rahman

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Applied Engineering and Technology
ISSN: 2829-4998
Email: aet@ascee.org | andri.pranolo.id@ieee.org
Published by: Association for Scientic Computing Electronics and Engineering (ASCEE)
Organized by: Association for Scientic Computing Electronics and Engineering (ASCEE), Universitas Negeri Malang, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
View My Stats AET
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.