(Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia)(2) P Atmodiwirjo
(Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia)(3) Y A Yatmo
(Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia)*corresponding author
AbstractThis study aims to investigate several elements as a form of threshold in the urban settlement. Threshold has the function of connectedness and separation, which is an integral part of spatial practice in urban settlements. That is how humans have the freedom to regulate their activities and space by using the threshold as connector or separator. In particular, this paper describes the elements function as a threshold for different conditions to connect and separate human roles and activities. The extent to which activities occur in a particular space and time in urban settlements is the key to determining the shape of the threshold. This paper presents an overview of the forms and performance of threshold that exist in urban settlements based on everyday practices. It not only discusses the function of elements as a threshold but also reveals the relationship between in-out of the everyday practice in urban settlements. The presence of thresholds in urban settlements is not only limited to physical elements. In this paper, we argue that the threshold element can produce a different performance due to the interacting activities between space and time. So that the understanding that connecting and separating cannot be seen as something fixed, but depends on other aspects that occur in everyday practice. This paper provides another understanding of the performance of thresholds in urban settlements, and this can be carried out in the development of a dynamic and transformative urban spatial design.
KeywordsTreshold element; Urban settlement; Connectedness and separation
|
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.31763/aet.v1i3.680 |
Article metrics10.31763/aet.v1i3.680 Abstract views : 1105 | PDF views : 439 |
Cite |
Full Text Download
|
References
[1] G. Simmel, “Bridge and Door,” Theory, Cult. Soc., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 5–10, Feb. 1994, doi: 10.1177/026327694011001002.
[2] M. J. Di Orio and T. L. Harrington, “Divergence Thresholds as Functions of Temporal Separation, Spatial Separation, and Retinal Locus,” Percept. Mot. Skills, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 459–468, Apr. 1983, doi: 10.2466/pms.1983.56.2.459.
[3] T. Boettger, Threshold Spaces. De Gruyter, p. 160, 2014, doi: 10.1515/9783038214007.
[4] M. P. Fontana, M. Mayorga, and M. Roa, “Le Corbusier: Urban Visions Through Thresholds,” J. Archit. Urban., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 87–98, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.3846/20297955.2016.1196541.
[5] L. Popov and M. B. Ellison, “Performance, Space, Time: The Production of Interiority in Black Rock City,” Interiors, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 53–74, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.2752/204191213X13601683874163.
[6] S. Attiwill, “Urban interior: interior-making in the urban environment,” in Proceedings of the 2011 IDA Congress Taipei Education Conference, 2011, pp. 217–224. [Online]. Available at: https://researchrepository.rmit.edu.au/esploro/outputs/conferenceProceeding/Urban-interior-interior-making-in-the-urban/9921858686801341.
[7] A. M. Brighenti, “On Territorology,” Theory, Cult. Soc., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 52–72, Jan. 2010, doi: 10.1177/0263276409350357.
[8] C. McCarthy, “Toward a Definition of Interiority,” Sp. Cult., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 112–125, May 2005, doi: 10.1177/1206331205275020.
[9] F. P. Ekdi and H. Çıracı, “Really public? Evaluating the publicness of public spaces in Istanbul by means of fuzzy logic modelling,” J. Urban Des., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 658–676, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1080/13574809.2015.1106919.
[10] H. Kamalipour, “Mapping Urban Interfaces: A Typology of Public/Private Interfaces in Informal Settlements,” Spaces Flows An Int. J. Urban ExtraUrban Stud., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 2017, doi: 10.18848/2154-8676/CGP/v08i02/1-12.
[11] D. A. Barnstone, “Between the Walls: the Berlin No-Man’s Land reconsidered,” J. Urban Des., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 287–301, May 2016, doi: 10.1080/13574809.2015.1133232.
[12] Stavros Stavrides, “Towards the city of thresholds,” EURE, vol. 44, no. 131, pp. 281–284, 2019. [Online]. Available at: https://www.commonnotions.org/city-of-thresholds.
[13] S. Smith, N. W. Swanson, and B. Gökarıksel, “Territory, bodies and borders,” Area, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 258–261, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1111/area.12247.
[14] P. Atmodiwirjo and Y. A. Yatmo, “Interiority: At the Threshold,” Interiority, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 107–111, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.7454/in.v2i2.66.
[15] R. Adams and L. Marlor, “Breaking the Binary Oppositions of the Interior: A Momentary Permanence,” Interiority, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 113–128, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.7454/in.v2i2.58.
[16] P. Atmodiwirjo, Y. AndriYatmo, and V. A. Ujung, “Outside Interior,” in IDEA JOURNAL, Dec. 1969, pp. 78–101, doi: 10.37113/ideaj.vi0.267.
[17] P. Simões Aelbrecht, “‘Fourth places’: the contemporary public settings for informal social interaction among strangers,” J. Urban Des., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 124–152, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1080/13574809.2015.1106920.
[18] M. Cetin, “Filling an Urban Void as a ‘Public Interior’ in Balikesir Contemporary Intervention into Historic Context through Interior Space,” A/Z ITU J. Fac. Archit., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 127–135, 2017, doi: 10.5505/itujfa.2017.19870.
[19] C. Klasto, “Tokyo’s Kyōshō Jūtaku: Nature through the Inside, Outside and the In-Between,” Interiority, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 155–176, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.7454/in.v2i2.63.
[20] R. U. Hinkel, The porous-city: atmospheric conversations of the Urban | Interior. Baunach, Germany: Spurbuchverlag, pp. 147-160, 2011. [Online]. Available at: https://researchrepository.rmit.edu.au/esploro/outputs/bookChapter/The-porous-city-atmospheric-conversations-of-the/9921858444901341.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 A R Harani, P Atmodiwirjo, Y A Yatmo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Applied Engineering and Technology
ISSN: 2829-4998
Email: aet@ascee.org | andri.pranolo.id@ieee.org
Published by: Association for Scientic Computing Electronics and Engineering (ASCEE)
Organized by: Association for Scientic Computing Electronics and Engineering (ASCEE), Universitas Negeri Malang, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
View My Stats AET
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.