Development of Residential Space for the ToKaili Community with a Phenomenological Approach in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia

(1) * Zaenal Siradjuddin Mail (Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, University of Tadulako, Indonesia)
(2) Gator Timbang Mail (Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, University of Tadulako, Indonesia)
(3) Lutfi Suyuti Mail (Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, University of Tadulako, Indonesia)
*corresponding author

Abstract


The uniqueness of the evolutionary process of housing and housing provision is directed by developments in culture, technology, and knowledge. This study aims to reveal what is behind the phenomenon of providing houses from time to time. This study uses a qualitative method with a phenomenological approach. The results of this analysis found several periods of Settlement, ranging from nomadic to ideal permanent solutions and farming settlement hierarchies.

Keywords


The process of evolution development; Settlement; Customary rules; Tokaili

   

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31763/aet.v1i3.679
      

Article metrics

10.31763/aet.v1i3.679 Abstract views : 981 | PDF views : 364

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

References


[1] Z. Siradjuddin, “Evolution Of Tokaili Settlement Process In Central Sulawesi, Indonesia,” Adv. Soc. Sci. Res. J., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 543–559, May 2021, doi: 10.14738/assrj.84.10097.

[2] Z. Sirajuddin, “Local Wisdom as a Planning Strategy and Sustainable Settlement Development in ToKaili Traditional Settlement, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia,” Rev. Eur. Stud., vol. 12, no. 2, p. 107, May 2020, doi: 10.5539/res.v12n2p107.

[3] L. R. Binford, “Willow Smoke and Dogs’ Tails: Hunter-Gatherer Settlement Systems and Archaeological Site Formation,” Am. Antiq., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 4–20, Jan. 1980, doi: 10.2307/279653.

[4] Z. Siradjuddin, “Raising Local Architecture Identity through ‘Gotong-Royong’ Work in Bajo Settings in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia,” Adv. Appl. Sociol., vol. 10, no. 06, pp. 236–255, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.4236/aasoci.2020.106015.

[5] R. J. Lawrence, “House Form and Culture: What have we Learnt in Thirty Years?,” in Culture—Meaning—Architecture, Routledge, 2019, pp. 53–76, doi: 10.4324/9781315200248-4.

[6] Z. Siradjuddin, P. City, C. S. Indonesia, and I. Introduction, “‘ Pengataa ’ And ‘ Nalodo ’ Natural Disasters With A Phenomenology Approach In Central,” Int. J. Res. Soc. Sci. Humanit., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2021, [Online]. Available at: https://gnpublication.org/index.php/ssh/article/download/1484/983/3571.

[7] R. W. Smith and V. Bugni, “Symbolic Interaction Theory and Architecture,” Symb. Interact., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 123–155, Apr. 2006, doi: 10.1525/si.2006.29.2.123.

[8] M. W. Schwarzer and A. Schmarsow, “The Emergence of Architectural Space: August Schmarsow’s Theory of ‘Raumgestaltung,’” Assemblage, no. 15, p. 48, Aug. 1991, doi: 10.2307/3171125.

[9] Z. Siradjuddin, “Development of Residential Space for the Tokaili Community in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia,” Stud. Soc. Sci. Res., vol. 2, no. 2, p. p35, May 2021, doi: 10.22158/sssr.v2n2p35.

[10] C. A. Doxiadis, “Ekistics, the science of human settlements,” Discuss. Ekistics Nature, Man, Shells, Soc. Networks. Summ. Athens Ekistics Mon. 1963-1971, vol. 33, no. 197, pp. 237–247, 1972. [Online]. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43621696.

[11] V. Buchli, An Anthropology of Architecture. Routledge, p. 222, 2020, doi: 10.4324/9781003084457.

[12] P. Healey, “The Pragmatic Tradition in Planning Thought,” J. Plan. Educ. Res., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 277–292, Mar. 2009, doi: 10.1177/0739456X08325175.

[13] P. Dalsgaard, “Pragmatism and Design Thinking,” Int. J. Des., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 143–155, 2014. [Online]. Available at: https://ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/1087/606.

[14] M. Holden, “The Tough Minded and the Tender Minded: A Pragmatic Turn for Sustainable Development Planning and Policy,” Plan. Theory Pract., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 475–496, Dec. 2008, doi: 10.1080/14649350802481371.

[15] D. P. Johnson, Sociological theory : classical founders and contemporary perspectives. Macmillan, p. 597, 1986. [Online]. Available at: https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130282269694868864.

[16] T. S. Kuhn, P. Hoyningen-huene, and H. Sankey, “The Road Since ‘Structure’: Philosophical Essays, 1970-1993, with an Autobiographical Interview,” Oxford Univ. Press behalf Br. Soc. Philos. Sci., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 137–142, 2002, doi: 10.1093/bjps/53.1.137.

[17] L. Schneider, “Max Weber: Wisdom and Science in Sociology,” Sociol. Q., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 462–472, Sep. 1971, doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1971.tb01375.x.

[18] D. McCleland, “The Achieving Society by,” Wiley Wesley. Univ., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 371–381, 1964, doi: 10.2307/2504238.

[19] Z. Siradjuddi, “Hintuvu Concept in Tokaili and Postmodern Architecture in Indonesia Hintuvu Concept in Tokaili and Postmodern Architecture in Indonesia,” J. Posit. Psychol. Wellbeing, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 66 – 80, 2021, [Online]. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Zaenal-Siradjuddin-2.

[20] Z. Siradjuddin, “‘Pehakovia’ and House Forming Strategy and To Kaili Settlement in Central Celebes Indonesia,” Adv. Anthropol., vol. 10, no. 01, pp. 1–16, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.4236/aa.2020.101001.

[21] H. A. Mattulada, “To-kaili (orang kaili),” J. Antropol. Indones., vol. 48, 1991. [Online]. Available at: https://lib.ui.ac.id.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Zaenal Siradjuddin, Gator Timbang, Lutfi Suyuti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Applied Engineering and Technology
ISSN: 2829-4998
Email: aet@ascee.org | andri.pranolo.id@ieee.org
Published by: Association for Scientic Computing Electronics and Engineering (ASCEE)
Organized by: Association for Scientic Computing Electronics and Engineering (ASCEE), Universitas Negeri Malang, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

View My Stats AET
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.